Hodnett E D, Gates S, Hofmeyr G J, Sakala C
Faculty of Nursing, 50 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3H4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.
Historically, women have been attended and supported by other women during labour. However, in recent decades in hospitals worldwide, continuous support during labour has become the exception rather than the routine. Concerns about the consequent dehumanization of women's birth experiences have led to calls for a return to continuous support by women for women during labour.
Primary: to assess the effects, on mothers and their babies, of continuous, one-to-one intrapartum support compared with usual care. Secondary: to determine whether the effects of continuous support are influenced by: (1) routine practices and policies in the birth environment that may affect a woman's autonomy, freedom of movement, and ability to cope with labour; (2) whether the caregiver is a member of the staff of the institution; and (3) whether the continuous support begins early or later in labour.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (30 January 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003).
All published and unpublished randomized controlled trials comparing continuous support during labour with usual care.
Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration Pregnancy and Childbirth Group were used. All authors participated in evaluation of methodological quality. Data extraction was undertaken independently by one author and a research assistant. Additional information was sought from the trial authors. Results are presented using relative risk for categorical data and weighted mean difference for continuous data.
Fifteen trials involving 12,791 women are included. Primary comparison: Women who had continuous intrapartum support were less likely to have intrapartum analgesia, operative birth, or to report dissatisfaction with their childbirth experiences. Subgroup analyses: In general, continuous intrapartum support was associated with greater benefits when the provider was not a member of the hospital staff, when it began early in labour, and in settings in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: All women should have support throughout labour and birth.
从历史上看,女性在分娩过程中一直由其他女性照料和支持。然而,在近几十年里,全球范围内的医院中,分娩期间的持续支持已成为例外而非惯例。对由此导致的女性分娩体验非人性化的担忧促使人们呼吁回归女性在分娩期间对女性的持续支持。
主要目的:评估与常规护理相比,一对一持续分娩期支持对母亲及其婴儿的影响。次要目的:确定持续支持的效果是否受以下因素影响:(1)分娩环境中可能影响女性自主权、行动自由和应对分娩能力的常规做法和政策;(2)护理人员是否为机构工作人员;(3)持续支持是在分娩早期还是晚期开始。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2003年1月30日)和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》,2003年第1期)。
所有比较分娩期间持续支持与常规护理的已发表和未发表的随机对照试验。
采用Cochrane协作网妊娠与分娩组的标准方法。所有作者参与了方法学质量评估。数据提取由一位作者和一名研究助理独立进行。向试验作者寻求了更多信息。分类数据的结果以相对风险呈现,连续数据的结果以加权均数差值呈现。
纳入了15项涉及12791名女性的试验。主要比较:接受分娩期持续支持的女性接受产时镇痛、手术分娩或对分娩体验表示不满的可能性较小。亚组分析:总体而言,当提供者不是医院工作人员、在分娩早期开始支持以及在不常规提供硬膜外镇痛的环境中,分娩期持续支持带来的益处更大。
所有女性在分娩和生产过程中都应获得支持。