Suppr超能文献

脂质体两性霉素B(安必素)与传统两性霉素B用于移植受者抗真菌治疗的回顾性临床比较

A retrospective clinical comparison between antifungal treatment with liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and conventional amphotericin B in transplant recipients.

作者信息

Tollemar J, Andersson S, Ringdén O, Tydén G

机构信息

Department of Transplantation Surgery, Huddinge Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Mycoses. 1992 Sep-Oct;35(9-10):215-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1992.tb00850.x.

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed bone marrow and solid organ transplant recipients. Treatment with amphotericin B, the drug of choice for these infections, is however often limited by toxicity. Ten transplant patients receiving a liposomal amphotericin B formulation (AmBisome) were compared to ten retrospective control patients given conventional amphotericin B. Each group included bone marrow (8), kidney (1), and liver transplant (1) recipients. Conventional amphotericin B treatment was instituted due to nine Candida infections, and one Aspergillus fumigatus infection. In the AmBisome group treatment was instituted due to eight Candida infections, one infection caused by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in one case as prophylactic treatment. In the amphotericin B group, maximal daily doses ranged from 0.1 to 0.65 mg kg-1 and cumulative doses were 21-836 mg kg-1 and were given over 3-32 days. In the AmBisome group, maximal daily doses ranged from 0.9 to 2.3 mg kg-1 and cumulative doses ranged from 225 to 3525 mg kg-1 over 8-28 days. All patients in the amphotericin B group experienced severe toxicity, especially nephrotoxicity which in four cases caused withdrawal of the drug. In contrast, the only adverse reaction in the AmBisome group was cholestasis in one patient. Only three out of ten patients in the amphotericin B group responded to treatment, seven patients died and six patients still had evidence of invasive fungal infection at autopsy. In contrast, eight out of nine patients in the AmBisome group responded to treatment, and the patient that received prophylaxis had a successful course.

摘要

侵袭性真菌感染是免疫抑制的骨髓和实体器官移植受者发病和死亡的重要原因。然而,作为这些感染首选药物的两性霉素B治疗常常受到毒性的限制。将10名接受脂质体两性霉素B制剂(安必素)治疗的移植患者与10名接受传统两性霉素B治疗的回顾性对照患者进行比较。每组包括骨髓移植受者(8名)、肾移植受者(1名)和肝移植受者(1名)。传统两性霉素B治疗用于9例念珠菌感染和1例烟曲霉感染。在安必素组,治疗用于8例念珠菌感染、1例酿酒酵母感染以及1例预防性治疗。在两性霉素B组,最大日剂量为0.1至0.65mg/kg-1,累积剂量为21至836mg/kg-1,给药时间为3至32天。在安必素组,最大日剂量为0.9至2.3mg/kg-1,累积剂量在8至28天内为225至3525mg/kg-1。两性霉素B组的所有患者均出现严重毒性,尤其是肾毒性,有4例因肾毒性而停药。相比之下,安必素组唯一的不良反应是1例患者出现胆汁淤积。两性霉素B组10名患者中只有3例对治疗有反应,7例死亡,6例在尸检时仍有侵袭性真菌感染的证据。相比之下,安必素组9名患者中有8例对治疗有反应,接受预防性治疗的患者病程顺利。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验