Casey A L, Worthington T, Lambert P A, Quinn D, Faroqui M H, Elliott T S J
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Aug;54(4):288-93. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00130-0.
The microbial contamination rate of luers of central venous catheters (CVCs) with either PosiFlow needleless connectors or standard caps attached was investigated. The efficacy of 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol, 0.5% (w/v) chlorhexidine in gluconate 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol and 10% (w/v) aqueous povidone-iodine to disinfect the intravenous connections was also assessed. Seventy-seven patients undergoing cardiac surgery who required a CVC as part of their clinical management were randomly allocated either needleless connectors or standard caps. Patients were also designated to receive chlorhexidine/alcohol, isopropyl alcohol or povidone-iodine for pre-CVC insertion skin preparation and disinfection of the connections. After 72 h in situ the microbial contamination rate of 580 luers, 306 with standard caps and 274 with needleless connectors attached, was determined. The microbial contamination rate of the external compression seals of 274 needleless connectors was also assessed to compare the efficacy of the three disinfectants. The internal surfaces of 55 out of 306 (18%) luers with standard caps were contaminated with micro-organisms, whilst only 18 out of 274 (6.6%) luers with needleless connectors were contaminated (P<0.0001). Of those needleless connectors disinfected with isopropyl alcohol, 69.2% were externally contaminated with micro-organisms compared with 30.8% disinfected with chlorhexidine/alcohol (P<0.0001) and 41.6% with povidone-iodine (P<0.0001). These results suggest that the use of needleless connectors may reduce the microbial contamination rate of CVC luers compared with the standard cap. Furthermore, disinfection of needleless connectors with either chlorhexidine/alcohol or povidone-iodine significantly reduced external microbial contamination. Both these strategies may reduce the risk of catheter-related infections acquired via the intraluminal route.
对连接了PosiFlow无针接头或标准帽的中心静脉导管(CVC)的鲁尔接头的微生物污染率进行了调查。还评估了70%(v/v)异丙醇、0.5%(w/v)葡萄糖酸氯己定加70%(v/v)异丙醇以及10%(w/v)聚维酮碘水溶液对静脉连接部位进行消毒的效果。77例接受心脏手术且临床治疗需要使用CVC的患者被随机分配使用无针接头或标准帽。患者还被指定接受氯己定/酒精、异丙醇或聚维酮碘用于CVC插入前的皮肤准备和连接部位的消毒。在导管留置72小时后,测定了580个鲁尔接头的微生物污染率,其中306个连接标准帽,274个连接无针接头。还评估了274个无针接头的外部压迫密封处的微生物污染率,以比较三种消毒剂的效果。306个连接标准帽的鲁尔接头中有55个(18%)的内表面被微生物污染,而连接无针接头的274个鲁尔接头中只有18个(6.6%)被污染(P<0.0001)。在用异丙醇消毒的无针接头中,69.2%的外部被微生物污染,相比之下,用氯己定/酒精消毒的为30.8%(P<0.0001),用聚维酮碘消毒的为41.6%(P<0.0001)。这些结果表明,与标准帽相比,使用无针接头可能会降低CVC鲁尔接头的微生物污染率。此外,用氯己定/酒精或聚维酮碘对无针接头进行消毒可显著降低外部微生物污染。这两种策略都可能降低通过管腔内途径获得的导管相关感染的风险。