Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013 Oct;57(4):282-7. doi: 10.1111/lam.12108. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
A repeatable and sensitive method to evaluate the effect of three antiseptics and two disinfection techniques on viable micro-organisms on luer-activated catheter needleless connectors (NCs) was developed. NCs were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis or Klebsiella pneumoniae and disinfected with 3·15% chlorhexidine gluconate + 70% isopropanol (CGI), 70% isopropanol (IPA) or 10% PVP povidone-iodine (PI) antiseptic pads using: (i) scrubbing the NC septum and threaded external surfaces or (ii) wiping only the surface of the septum. Treatments were also evaluated against NCs pretreated with human serum and exposed for 18 h to Staph. epidermidis prior to testing. Viable cells were quantified by plate count. The method for inoculation and recovery of luminal micro-organisms was repeatable (SD, 0·31; n = 28). IPA disinfection provided an approximate 3 log10 CFU reduction; CGI and PI provided 3-4 log10 reductions. PI and CGI were more effective than IPA (P < 0·05), but differences between CGI and PI were not significant for either disinfection method. IPA, but not CGI and PI was also less effective (P < 0·05) against NCs inoculated with Kl. pneumoniae than Staph. epidermidis. Pretreatment with serum and prolonged Staph. epidermidis inoculation removed the advantage seen with CGI and PI; log10 reductions were 1·80, 1·73 and 2·50 for CGI, PI and IPA, respectively. PI or CGI may be more effective than IPA for NC disinfection but effectiveness may be reduced on NCs contaminated with blood or serum.
sensitive and repeatable protocol was developed to evaluate antiseptics for disinfecting catheter needleless connectors (NCs). Povidone-iodine (PI) and chlorhexidine gluconate plus isopropanol (CGI) were more effective than isopropanol (IPA) for reducing Staphylococcus epidermidis contamination of NCs. The effectiveness of PI and CGI was reduced on NCs pre-exposed to human serum and prolonged bacterial inoculation. IPA was also less effective against NCs contaminated with Klebsiella pneumoniae.
开发一种可重复且灵敏的方法,以评估三种防腐剂和两种消毒技术对鲁尔激活式无针连接器(NC)上存活微生物的效果。
将表皮葡萄球菌或肺炎克雷伯菌接种到 NC 上,并用 3.15%葡萄糖酸氯己定+70%异丙醇(CGI)、70%异丙醇(IPA)或 10% PVP 聚维酮碘(PI)抗菌垫进行消毒:(i)擦拭 NC 隔片和螺纹外表面,或(ii)仅擦拭隔片表面。还评估了预处理有人血清并在测试前暴露于表皮葡萄球菌 18 小时的 NC 的处理效果。通过平板计数定量活细胞。接种和内腔微生物回收方法具有可重复性(SD,0.31;n=28)。IPA 消毒可提供约 3log10 CFU 的减少;CGI 和 PI 提供 3-4log10 减少。PI 和 CGI 比 IPA 更有效(P<0.05),但对于两种消毒方法,CGI 和 PI 之间没有差异。IPA 对接种肺炎克雷伯菌的 NC 的效果不如表皮葡萄球菌(P<0.05),而 CGI 和 PI 则不然。用血清预处理和延长表皮葡萄球菌接种会消除 CGI 和 PI 的优势;CGI、PI 和 IPA 的 log10 减少量分别为 1.80、1.73 和 2.50。PI 或 CGI 可能比 IPA 更有效地用于 NC 消毒,但在 NC 被血液或血清污染时,有效性可能会降低。
开发了一种敏感且可重复的方案来评估消毒剂对无针导管连接器(NC)的消毒效果。聚维酮碘(PI)和葡萄糖酸氯己定+异丙醇(CGI)比异丙醇(IPA)更有效地减少表皮葡萄球菌对 NC 的污染。PI 和 CGI 的有效性在 NC 预先暴露于人血清和延长细菌接种后会降低。IPA 对污染有肺炎克雷伯菌的 NC 的效果也较差。