Suppr超能文献

[不同术后疼痛管理方法对腹部手术儿茶酚胺反应的影响]

[Effect of different methods for postoperative pain management on catecholamine response to abdominal surgery].

作者信息

Zeng Li, Wu Xinmin, Ma Qiong, Su Yu

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2003 Apr 18;35(2):187-90.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effect of different analgesic methods and the influence of catecholamine response to elective abdominal surgery.

METHODS

42 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomly divided into five groups. After receiving combined general and epidural anesthesia, postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia was provided in group RF, BF, BM with 1.2 g.L-1 ropivacaine + 2 mg.L-1 fentanyl, 1.2 g.L-1 bupivacaine + 2 mg.L-1 fentanyl, 1.2 g.L-1 bupivacaine + 80 mg.L-1 morphine respectively. Group EM received general-epidural anesthesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with 0.5 g.L-1 morphine. Levels of analgesics (VAS, VRS), plasma concentrations of adrenaline and noradenaline were measured.

RESULTS

Effective analgesia could be achieved in all groups. VAS in groups BM and M was significantly less than that in groups RF, and VRS in groups BM was higher than that in groups RF, EM and M. There were more side effects in groups BM, M and EM, and the incidence of nausea was highest in group M(5 cases). The adrenaline concentrations in group BM one hour postoperation was lower than that in group BF, and noradrenaline in group EM was lower than that in group RF. The 24-hour postoperative values of the adrenaline and noradrenaline in group M were higher than their preoperative values.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative patient-controlled epidural or intravenous analgesia could provide effective analgesia. Epidural anesthesia during operation or epidural analgesia postoperation could depress stress responses, thus it is a more effective analgesic method.

摘要

目的

观察不同镇痛方法对择期腹部手术的效果及儿茶酚胺反应的影响。

方法

将42例拟行择期腹部手术的ASA I-II级患者随机分为五组。在联合全身麻醉和硬膜外麻醉后,RF组、BF组、BM组分别用1.2 g.L-1罗哌卡因+2 mg.L-1芬太尼、1.2 g.L-1布比卡因+2 mg.L-1芬太尼、1.2 g.L-1布比卡因+80 mg.L-1吗啡进行术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛。EM组接受全身-硬膜外麻醉并用0.5 g.L-1吗啡进行患者自控静脉镇痛。测定镇痛水平(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]、语言评价量表[VRS])、血浆肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素浓度。

结果

所有组均能实现有效镇痛。BM组和M组的VAS显著低于RF组,BM组的VRS高于RF组、EM组和M组。BM组、M组和EM组的副作用较多,M组恶心发生率最高(5例)。术后1小时BM组的肾上腺素浓度低于BF组,EM组的去甲肾上腺素浓度低于RF组。M组术后24小时的肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素值高于术前值。

结论

术后患者自控硬膜外或静脉镇痛均可提供有效镇痛。术中硬膜外麻醉或术后硬膜外镇痛可减轻应激反应,因此是一种更有效的镇痛方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验