Padberg B
Institut für Anthropologie, Göttingen.
Sudhoffs Arch. 1992;76(2):164-78.
Diseases result from hazards and influences originating in one's environment and could be described in evolutionary terms as maladaptations. Variations in the pattern of diseases throughout times and places can therefore indicate variations in the living conditions of ancient populations. Palaeopathology is the only way of gathering empirical data suitable for the reconstruction of epidemiological developments in the past. In spite of an abundance of material from the middle ages, only 25 series turned out to fulfill two crucial prerequisites, a certain minimal sizes and a palaeopathological analysis. Still a statistical comparison of those palaeopathological analyses proved impossible, because in most cases only casuistic details were available. This deficiency results from a lack of concept within palaeopathology. The ecosystem theory offers a basis for the development of a far-reaching concept. Widely accepted paradigms are indispensable for a prolific interdisciplinary cooperation on the highly relevant and complex phenomenon disease. Working with a standardized concept palaeopathology will be able to contribute to the solution of questions central to both, social history and environmental archaeology.
疾病源于个人环境中的危险因素和影响,从进化的角度来看,可以将其描述为适应不良。因此,疾病模式在不同时间和地点的变化可以表明古代人群生活条件的变化。古病理学是收集适合重建过去流行病学发展的经验数据的唯一途径。尽管有大量中世纪的资料,但只有25个系列满足两个关键前提条件,即一定的最小规模和古病理学分析。然而,对这些古病理学分析进行统计比较仍然是不可能的,因为在大多数情况下,只有个别病例的详细信息。这种不足源于古病理学缺乏概念。生态系统理论为发展一个影响深远的概念提供了基础。广泛接受的范式对于就高度相关和复杂的疾病现象进行富有成效的跨学科合作是不可或缺的。运用标准化概念,古病理学将能够为解决社会历史和环境考古学的核心问题做出贡献。