Betteridge Glenn
Policy & Research, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, Canada.
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2003 Apr;8(1):57-60.
In a 9 January 2003 ruling in Hitzig, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice determined that the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) fail to provide for a legal source and safe supply of marijuana. This failure infringed the applicants' section 7 Charter rights to liberty and security of the person in a manner inconsistent with the principles of fundamental justice. The MMAR could not be saved under section I of the Charter. The Court declared the MMAR invalid, but suspended that order for six months to allow the government to decide how to create a legal source and supply of marijuana.
在2003年1月9日对希齐格案的裁决中，安大略高等法院判定《医用大麻获取条例》（MMAR）未能提供合法的大麻来源及安全供应。这种不作为以不符合基本司法原则的方式侵犯了申请人根据《宪章》第7条享有的生命、自由和人身安全权利。《宪章》第1条无法挽救MMAR。法院宣布MMAR无效，但将该命令暂停六个月，以便政府决定如何建立合法的大麻来源及供应。
