• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

An overview of the use of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ranking and prioritizing large chemical inventories for environmental risk assessments.

作者信息

Russom Christine L, Breton Roger L, Walker John D, Bradbury Steven P

机构信息

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, 6201 Congdon Boulevard, Duluth, Minnesota 55804, USA.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1810-21. doi: 10.1897/01-194.

DOI:10.1897/01-194
PMID:12924580
Abstract

Ecological risk assessments for chemical stressors are used to establish linkages between likely exposure concentrations and adverse effects to ecological receptors. At times, it is useful to conduct screening risk assessments to assist in prioritizing or ranking chemicals on the basis of potential hazard and exposure assessment parameters. Ranking of large chemical inventories can provide evidence for focusing research and/or cleanup efforts on specific chemicals of concern. Because of financial and time constraints, data gaps exist, and the risk assessor is left with decisions on which models to use to estimate the parameter of concern. In this review, several methods are presented for using quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in conducting hazard screening or screening-level risk assessments. The ranking methods described include those related to current regulatory issues associated with chemical inventories from Canada, Europe, and the United States and an example of a screening-level risk assessment conducted on chemicals associated with a watershed in the midwest region of the United States.

摘要

相似文献

1
An overview of the use of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ranking and prioritizing large chemical inventories for environmental risk assessments.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1810-21. doi: 10.1897/01-194.
2
Quantitative structure-activity relationships for predicting potential ecological hazard of organic chemicals for use in regulatory risk assessments.用于监管风险评估的预测有机化学品潜在生态危害的定量构效关系。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1822-8. doi: 10.1897/01-261.
3
Use of knowledge bases and QSARs to estimate the relative ecological risk of agrichemicals: a problem formulation exercise.利用知识库和定量构效关系来评估农用化学品的相对生态风险:一个问题阐述练习。
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 1995;4(2-3):83-95. doi: 10.1080/10629369508029906.
4
Ranking of concern, based on environmental indexes, for pharmaceutical and personal care products: an application to the Spanish case.基于环境指标的药品和个人护理产品关注度排名:以西班牙为例的应用。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:384-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.035. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
5
Overview of data and conceptual approaches for derivation of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ecotoxicological effects of organic chemicals.有机化学品生态毒理效应定量构效关系推导的数据与概念方法概述
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1789-98. doi: 10.1897/01-234.
6
QSAR modeling of cumulative environmental end-points for the prioritization of hazardous chemicals.用于优先考虑危险化学品的累积环境终点的定量构效关系建模。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018 Jan 24;20(1):38-47. doi: 10.1039/c7em00519a.
7
Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for prediction of estrogen receptor binding affinity of structurally diverse chemicals.用于预测结构多样化学物质雌激素受体结合亲和力的定量构效关系模型。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1844-54. doi: 10.1897/01-345.
8
QSARs for identifying and prioritizing substances with persistence and bioconcentration potential.用于识别具有持久性和生物富集潜力的物质并对其进行优先级排序的定量构效关系
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2002 Dec;13(7-8):713-25. doi: 10.1080/1062936021000043454.
9
Bioaccumulation assessments point to pressing data gaps.
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Jul 1;39(13):278A.
10
It is time to develop ecological thresholds of toxicological concern to assist environmental hazard assessment.现在是时候制定毒理学关注的生态阈值,以协助环境危害评估了。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2015 Dec;34(12):2864-9. doi: 10.1002/etc.3132. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative structure-activity relationship model development for estimating the predicted No-effect concentration of petroleum hydrocarbon and derivatives in the ecological risk assessment.用于生态风险评估中估算石油烃及其衍生物预测无效应浓度的定量构效关系模型开发。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 28;10(5):e26808. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26808. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
2
Prediction of the Fate of Organic Compounds in the Environment From Their Molecular Properties: A Review.基于分子性质预测环境中有机化合物的归宿:综述
Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jun 18;45(12):1277-1377. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2014.955627.
3
Evaluation of artificial intelligence based models for chemical biodegradability prediction.
基于人工智能的化学物质生物降解性预测模型评估
Molecules. 2004 Dec 31;9(12):989-1004. doi: 10.3390/91200989.