Suppr超能文献

体外研究单组分和多组分粘合剂周围的微生物生长情况。

Microbial ingrowth around single- and multi-component adhesives studied in vitro.

作者信息

Preussker S, Klimm W, Pöschmann M, Koch R

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Caries Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;37(5):345-51. doi: 10.1159/000072166.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro microbial leakage in 4 micro-hybrid composites in combination with 4 single-component dental adhesives (Scotchbond 1/Z100 MP = group 1; Syntac Single-Component/Tetric Flow = group 3; OptiBond Solo/XRV Herculite = group 5; Solobond M/Arabesk Top = group 7) and 4 multi-component dental adhesives (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose/Z100 MP = group 2; Syntac/Tetric Flow = group 4; OptiBond FL/XRV Herculite = group 6; Solobond Plus/Arabesk Top = group 8). Ninety-four mixed standardized Class V cavities of human caries-free extracted premolars were filled with eight different composite adhesive systems using a one-layer (groups 1-4) or a two-layer technique (groups 5-8). After thermocycling and incubation in a broth culture of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus, followed by decalcification and staining, the extent and the type of microbial leakage were measured histologically. The extent of microbial leakage in the composite restorations was very low in all groups and there were no significant differences between adhesives. Z100 MP in combination with single- and multi-component adhesives showed a significantly higher microbial leakage than Tetric Flow systems (U test: p=0.037). XRV Herculite adhesive systems showed significantly less extensive microbial leakage than Arabesk Top adhesive systems (U test: p<0.001). The single-component dental adhesives achieved a marginal adaptation of composites comparable to that of multi-component adhesives in vitro.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较4种微混合复合树脂与4种单组分牙科粘结剂(Scotchbond 1/Z100 MP = 第1组;Syntac单组分/Tetric Flow = 第3组;OptiBond Solo/XRV Herculite = 第5组;Solobond M/Arabesk Top = 第7组)以及4种多组分牙科粘结剂(Scotchbond多功能/Z100 MP = 第2组;Syntac/Tetric Flow = 第4组;OptiBond FL/XRV Herculite = 第6组;Solobond Plus/Arabesk Top = 第8组)组合后的体外微生物渗漏情况。使用94颗无龋的人类拔除前磨牙制备的标准V类混合洞型,采用单层技术(第1 - 4组)或双层技术(第5 - 8组),用8种不同的复合树脂粘结系统进行充填。在变链链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌肉汤培养中进行热循环和孵育,随后进行脱钙和染色,通过组织学方法测量微生物渗漏的程度和类型。所有组的复合树脂修复体中微生物渗漏程度都非常低,粘结剂之间无显著差异。Z100 MP与单组分和多组分粘结剂组合时,其微生物渗漏显著高于Tetric Flow系统(U检验:p = 0.037)。XRV Herculite粘结系统的微生物渗漏范围显著小于Arabesk Top粘结系统(U检验:p < 0.001)。单组分牙科粘结剂在体外实现的复合树脂边缘适应性与多组分粘结剂相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验