Corliss J O
Biosystems. 1992;28(1-3):1-14. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(92)90003-h.
The present Botanical and Zoological Codes of Nomenclature are often inadequate for resolution of all the peculiar problems caused by the very nature of the numerous and diverse groups of the so-called 'lower' eukaryotic organisms known as protists. Whether or not a separate code should therefore be created for these species--many but not all of which are unicellular in structure and microscopic in size--is complicated by several factors. The principal one is related to the wide dispersal of protists throughout many taxonomic classes and phyla/divisions; sometimes even multiple kingdoms are involved. If recognition of a single kingdom Protista is no longer tenable, then even the concept of one code per kingdom is not applicable. Other difficulties arise primarily from long-standing differences in major provisions of present Botanical and Zoological Codes. Numerous 'ambiregnal' forms exist, species currently under dual code jurisdiction. The matter of names for suprafamilial taxa of protists, irrespective of their ultimate kingdom assignment, poses another set of concerns not yet resolved. A plea is made to recognize the legitimacy of having distinct high-level ranks for protist species that seem to be widely separated phylogenetically from fellow protists or from other eukaryotic assemblages.
现行的植物学和动物学命名法规往往不足以解决由众多不同的所谓“低等”真核生物类群(即原生生物)的本质所引发的所有特殊问题。对于这些物种(其中许多但并非全部在结构上是单细胞的且体积微小)是否应制定单独的法规,受到几个因素的影响而变得复杂。主要因素与原生生物在许多分类类别和门/纲中的广泛分布有关;有时甚至涉及多个界。如果承认单独的原生生物界不再站得住脚,那么每个界一个法规的概念甚至也不适用。其他困难主要源于现行植物学和动物学命名法规主要条款中存在的长期差异。存在许多“双界”形式,即目前处于双重法规管辖之下的物种。原生生物科级以上分类单元的名称问题,无论其最终归属哪个界,都引发了另一组尚未解决的问题。有人呼吁认识到为那些在系统发育上似乎与其他原生生物或其他真核生物组合广泛分离的原生生物物种设立不同高级分类阶元的合理性。