Knapp Sandra, Lamas Gerardo, Lughadha Eimear Nic, Novarino Gianfranco
Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):611-22. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1445.
Nomenclature, far from being a dry dusty subject, is today more relevant than ever before. Researchers into genomics are discovering again the need for systems of nomenclature-names are what we use to communicate about organisms, and by extension the rest of their biology. Here, we briefly outline the history of the published international codes of nomenclature, tracing them from the time of Linnaeus in the eighteenth century to the present day. We then outline some of what we feel are the major challenges that face the codes in the twenty-first century; focusing primarily on publication, priority, typification and the role of science in the naming of organisms. We conclude that the codes are essential for taxonomists in the pursuance of their science, and that the democratic nature of decision-making in the regulation of the rules of nomenclature, though sometimes perceived as a potential weakness, is in fact one of its great strengths.
命名法远非一个枯燥乏味的学科,如今它比以往任何时候都更具相关性。基因组学研究人员再次发现了命名系统的必要性——名称是我们用来交流生物体及其生物学其他方面的工具。在此,我们简要概述已发布的国际命名法规的历史,追溯其从18世纪林奈时代至今的发展历程。然后,我们概述一些我们认为在21世纪法规所面临的主要挑战;主要关注出版物、优先权、模式指定以及科学在生物体命名中的作用。我们得出结论,这些法规对于分类学家从事其科学研究至关重要,而且在命名规则的制定过程中决策的民主性质,尽管有时被视为一种潜在弱点,但实际上是其巨大优势之一。