Carroll Raymond J
Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3143, USA.
Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):211-20. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.t01-1-00027.
In classical problems, e.g., comparing two populations, fitting a regression surface, etc., variability is a nuisance parameter. The term "nuisance parameter" is meant here in both the technical and the practical sense. However, there are many instances where understanding the structure of variability is just as central as understanding the mean structure. The purpose of this article is to review a few of these problems. I focus in particular on two issues: (a) the determination of the validity of an assay; and (b) the issue of the power for detecting health effects from nutrient intakes when the latter are measured by food frequency questionnaires. I will also briefly mention the problems of variance structure in generalized linear mixed models, robust parameter design in quality technology, and the signal in microarrays. In these and other problems, treating variance structure as a nuisance instead of a central part of the modeling effort not only leads to inefficient estimation of means, but also to misleading conclusions.
在经典问题中,例如比较两个总体、拟合回归曲面等,变异性是一个干扰参数。这里的“干扰参数”一词在技术和实际意义上都是如此。然而,在许多情况下,理解变异性的结构与理解均值结构同样重要。本文的目的是回顾其中的一些问题。我特别关注两个问题:(a)分析方法有效性的确定;(b)当通过食物频率问卷测量营养素摄入量时,检测健康效应的功效问题。我还将简要提及广义线性混合模型中的方差结构问题、质量技术中的稳健参数设计以及微阵列中的信号问题。在这些以及其他问题中,将方差结构视为干扰因素而非建模工作的核心部分,不仅会导致均值估计效率低下,还会得出误导性结论。