Behrmann Marlene, Ewell Catherine
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, USA. behrmann+@cmu.edu
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):480-6. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02458.
This article explores expertise in tactile object recognition. In one study, participants were trained to differing degrees of accuracy on tactile identification of two-dimensional patterns. Recognition of these patterns, of inverted versions of these patterns, and of subparts of these patterns was then tested. The inversion effect (better recognition of upright than inverted patterns) and the part-whole effect (better recognition of the whole than a part pattern), traditionally considered signatures of visual expertise, were observed for tactile experts but not for novices. In a second study, participants were trained as visual or tactile experts and then tested in the trained and nontrained modalities. Whereas expertise effects were observed in the modality of training, cross-modal transfer was asymmetric; visual experts showed generalization to haptic recognition, but tactile experts did not show generalization to visual recognition. Tactile expertise is not obviously attributable to visual mediation and emerges from domain-general principles that operate independently of modality.
本文探讨了触觉物体识别方面的专业技能。在一项研究中,参与者在二维图案的触觉识别上接受了不同程度的准确性训练。然后对这些图案、这些图案的倒置版本以及这些图案的子部分的识别进行了测试。传统上被认为是视觉专业技能标志的倒置效应(对正立图案的识别优于倒置图案)和部分 - 整体效应(对整体的识别优于部分图案),在触觉专家身上观察到了,而新手则没有。在第二项研究中,参与者被训练成为视觉或触觉专家,然后在训练和未训练的模式下进行测试。虽然在训练模式中观察到了专业技能效应,但跨模态转移是不对称的;视觉专家表现出向触觉识别的泛化,而触觉专家没有表现出向视觉识别的泛化。触觉专业技能并非明显归因于视觉中介,而是源自独立于模态运作的领域通用原则。