Suppr超能文献

初次及翻修腰椎间盘切除术。来自一个中心的16年回顾。

Primary and revision lumbar discectomy. A 16-year review from one centre.

作者信息

Morgan-Hough C V J, Jones P W, Eisenstein S M

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, England.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Aug;85(6):871-4.

Abstract

We present a review of 553 patients who underwent surgery for intractable sciatica ascribed to prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. One surgeon in one institution undertook or supervised all the operations over a period of 16 years. The total number of primary discectomies included in the study was 531, of which 42 subsequently required a second operation for recurrent sciatica, giving a revision rate of 7.9%. Factors associated with reoperation were analysed. A contained disc protrusion was almost three times more likely to need revision surgery, compared with extruded or sequestrated discs. Patients with primary protrusions had a significantly greater straight-leg raise and reduced incidence of positive neurological findings compared with those with extruded or sequestrated discs. These patients should therefore be selected out clinically and treated by a more enthusiastic conservative programme, since they are three times more likely to require revision surgery.

摘要

我们对553例因腰椎间盘突出症导致顽固性坐骨神经痛而接受手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。在16年的时间里,一家机构的一名外科医生承担或监督了所有手术。该研究中纳入的初次椎间盘切除术总数为531例,其中42例随后因复发性坐骨神经痛需要二次手术,翻修率为7.9%。分析了与再次手术相关的因素。与游离或脱出型椎间盘相比,包容性椎间盘突出症需要翻修手术的可能性几乎高出三倍。与游离或脱出型椎间盘患者相比,初次突出型患者的直腿抬高明显更高,神经学阳性体征的发生率更低。因此,这些患者应在临床上被挑选出来,并采用更积极的保守治疗方案,因为他们需要翻修手术的可能性高出三倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验