Kaufman A S, Kaufman J C
Yale University School of Medicine, USA.
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):258-64.
R. D. Roberts, M. Zeidner, and G. Matthews (2001) have carefully examined the controversial issue of whether emotional intelligence (EI) should be classified as an intelligence and whether EI's constructs meet the same psychometric standards as general intelligence's constructs. This article casts their efforts into the framework of both historical and modern IQ-testing theory and research. It details David Wechsler's attempts to integrate EI into his tests and how his conception of a good clinician would be that of an emotionally intelligent clinician. Current theories and research on IQ also have a role in EI beyond what Roberts et al. described, including J. L. Horn's (1989) expanded model and A. R. Luria's (1966) neuropsychological research, and better criteria than the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery should be used in future EI studies. The authors look forward to more research being conducted on EI, particularly in future performance-based assessments.
R. D. 罗伯茨、M. 蔡德纳和G. 马修斯（2001年）仔细研究了一个颇具争议的问题，即情商（EI）是否应被归类为一种智力，以及情商的构成要素是否符合与一般智力的构成要素相同的心理测量标准。本文将他们的研究成果置于历史和现代智商测试理论及研究的框架之中。文中详述了大卫·韦克斯勒将情商纳入其测试的尝试，以及他心目中优秀临床医生应是具备情商的临床医生的观点。当前关于智商的理论和研究在情商方面所起的作用超出了罗伯茨等人所描述的范围，其中包括J. L. 霍恩（1989年）的扩展模型和A. R. 卢里亚（1966年）的神经心理学研究，并且在未来的情商研究中应采用比军队职业能力倾向测验更好的标准。作者期待对情商开展更多研究，尤其是在未来基于表现的评估方面。
