Roberts R D, Zeidner M, Matthews G
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia.
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):196-231.
Performance-based measures of emotional intelligence (EI) are more likely than measures based on self-report to assess EI as a construct distinct from personality. A multivariate investigation was conducted with the performance-based, Multi-Factor Emotional Intelligence Scale (MEIS; J. D. Mayer, D. Caruso, & P. Salovey, 1999). Participants (N = 704) also completed the Trait Self-Description Inventory (TSDI, a measure of the Big Five personality factors; Christal, 1994; R. D. Roberts et al.), and the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB, a measure of intelligence). Results were equivocal. Although the MEIS showed convergent validity (correlating moderately with the ASVAB) and divergent validity (correlating minimally with the TSDI), different scoring protocols (i.e., expert and consensus) yielded contradictory findings. Analyses of factor structure and subscale reliability identified further measurement problems. Overall, it is questionable whether the MEIS operationalizes EI as a reliable and valid construct.
与基于自我报告的测量方法相比，基于表现的情商（EI）测量方法更有可能将情商评估为一种与人格不同的结构。我们使用基于表现的多因素情商量表（MEIS；J.D. 梅耶、D. 卡鲁索和P. 萨洛维，1999年）进行了一项多变量调查。参与者（N = 704）还完成了特质自我描述量表（TSDI，一种测量大五人格因素的量表；克里斯托，1994年；R.D. 罗伯茨等人）以及武装部队职业能力倾向测验（ASVAB，一种智力测量工具）。结果并不明确。虽然MEIS显示出收敛效度（与ASVAB中度相关）和区分效度（与TSDI最小程度相关），但不同的评分协议（即专家评分和共识评分）产生了相互矛盾的结果。对因素结构和子量表信度的分析发现了更多的测量问题。总体而言，MEIS是否将情商作为一种可靠且有效的结构进行操作化是值得怀疑的。
