Mayer J D, Salovey P, Caruso D R, Sitarenios G
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824, USA.
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):232-42.
The authors have claimed that emotional intelligence (EI) meets traditional standards for an intelligence (J. D. Mayer, D. R. Caruso, & P. Salovey, 1999). R. D. Roberts, M. Zeidner, and G. Matthews (2001) questioned whether that claim was warranted. The central issue raised by Roberts et al. concerning Mayer et al. (1999) is whether there are correct answers to questions on tests purporting to measure EI as a set of abilities. To address this issue (and others), the present authors briefly restate their view of intelligence, emotion, and EI. They then present arguments for the reasonableness of measuring EI as an ability, indicate that correct answers exist, and summarize recent data suggesting that such measures are, indeed, reliable.
作者们宣称，情商（EI）符合智力的传统标准（J. D. 梅耶、D. R. 卡鲁索和P. 萨洛维，1999年）。R. D. 罗伯茨、M. 蔡德纳和G. 马修斯（2001年）质疑了这一说法是否合理。罗伯茨等人针对梅耶等人（1999年）提出的核心问题是，在旨在将EI作为一组能力进行测量的测试中，问题是否存在正确答案。为了解决这个问题（以及其他问题），本文作者简要重申了他们对智力、情感和EI的观点。然后，他们提出了将EI作为一种能力进行测量的合理性的论据，指出存在正确答案，并总结了最近的数据，表明这些测量确实是可靠的。
