• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对本科护理专业学生的课堂式、网络强化式及网络远程学习营养课程评估。

Evaluation of classroom-based, Web-enhanced, and Web-based distance learning nutrition courses for undergraduate nursing.

作者信息

Buckley Kathleen M

机构信息

School of Nursing, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2003 Aug;42(8):367-70. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-09.

DOI:10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-09
PMID:12938900
Abstract

A traditional classroom-based course was transitioned during three semesters to a Web-enhanced and then a Web-based course. This nutrition course was part of the core curriculum for 58 undergraduate nursing students. Evaluation data were collected and analyzed to compare the effectiveness of the traditional classroom, Web-enhanced, and Web-based courses. Areas of evaluation included mid-term and final examination scores and course grades, as well as student self-reports of instructor preparation, instructor-student interaction, testing, course objectives and assignments, textbooks, and strengths and weaknesses of the course. No differences were found in student learning outcomes. Although the Web-based course received the lowest mean course evaluation score, which was significantly different from the scores of the other two instructional methods, the students' qualitative comments revealed both positive and negative aspects of online instruction.

摘要

一门传统的基于课堂的课程在三个学期内逐步转变为网络强化课程,然后又转变为网络课程。这门营养课程是58名本科护理专业学生核心课程的一部分。收集并分析了评估数据,以比较传统课堂、网络强化和网络课程的有效性。评估领域包括期中考试和期末考试成绩及课程成绩,以及学生对教师准备情况、师生互动、测试、课程目标与作业、教科书以及课程优缺点的自我报告。在学生学习成果方面未发现差异。虽然网络课程的平均课程评估得分最低,且与其他两种教学方法的得分有显著差异,但学生的定性评论揭示了在线教学的积极和消极方面。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of classroom-based, Web-enhanced, and Web-based distance learning nutrition courses for undergraduate nursing.针对本科护理专业学生的课堂式、网络强化式及网络远程学习营养课程评估。
J Nurs Educ. 2003 Aug;42(8):367-70. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-09.
2
Web-based vs. traditional classroom instruction in gerontology: a pilot study.老年学中基于网络的教学与传统课堂教学:一项初步研究。
J Dent Hyg. 2005 Summer;79(3):7. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
3
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a Web-based graduate epidemiology course.基于网络的研究生流行病学课程效果评估
Comput Nurs. 2000 Jul-Aug;18(4):162-7.
4
Student satisfaction with a Website designed for three nursing courses.学生对为三门护理课程设计的网站的满意度。
CIN Plus. 2000 Jan 1;3(1):12, 6-7.
5
Predictors of student satisfaction in distance-delivered graduate nursing courses: what matters most?远程授课的护理学研究生课程中学生满意度的预测因素:最重要的是什么?
J Prof Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):149-63. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(03)00072-3.
6
Performance and satisfaction of second-degree BSN students in Web-based and traditional course delivery environments.基于网络和传统课程交付环境下的护理学理学学士二年级学生的表现与满意度。
J Nurs Educ. 2004 Jun;43(6):280-4. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20040601-07.
7
Online vs classroom instruction: student satisfaction and learning outcomes in an undergraduate Allied Health pharmacology course.线上教学与课堂教学:本科联合健康药理学课程中的学生满意度与学习成果
J Allied Health. 2009 Summer;38(2):e36-42.
8
Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. World Wide Web-based baccalaureate nursing research course.传统与基于万维网的护理学学士学位研究课程中学生学习成果与偏好的比较。
J Nurs Educ. 2000 Apr;39(4):149-54. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-20000401-04.
9
Implementing Web-based instruction in a school of nursing: implications for faculty and students.在一所护理学院实施基于网络的教学:对教师和学生的影响。
J Prof Nurs. 2000 Sep-Oct;16(5):273-81. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2000.9459.
10
Application of the Flipped Classroom Approach in an Undergraduate Maternal-Newborn Nursing Course to Improve Clinical Reasoning.翻转课堂在本科母婴护理课程中应用以提高临床推理能力
Creat Nurs. 2022 Feb 1;28(1):48-53. doi: 10.1891/CRNR-D-19-00084.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Different Attitudes toward Face-to-Face and Online Classes on Learning Outcomes in Japan.日本对面对面授课和在线课程的不同态度对学习成果的影响。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jan 13;11(1):16. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11010016.
2
Exploring nurses' experiences of social media and in-person educational interventions for professional development: a qualitative study.探索护士对社交媒体和面对面教育干预促进职业发展的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 May 24;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00903-4.
3
Students' Knowledge Comprehension after Implementation of Live Conventional Demonstration, Video Teaching and Video-Assisted Instruction Methods in Endodontic Practice.
在牙髓病治疗实践中实施现场传统示范、视频教学和视频辅助教学方法后学生的知识理解情况
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):201-204. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.39.
4
Realist synthesis of educational interventions to improve nutrition care competencies and delivery by doctors and other healthcare professionals.对教育干预措施进行现实主义综合分析,以提高医生和其他医疗保健专业人员的营养护理能力及服务水平。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 21;6(10):e010084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010084.
5
Comparison of online versus classroom delivery of an immunization elective course.免疫选修课程在线授课与课堂授课的比较。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Jun 17;78(5):96. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78596.
6
Assessing the quality of a web-based learning system for nurses.评估一个面向护士的网络学习系统的质量。
J Med Syst. 2009 Aug;33(4):317-25. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9193-1.
7
Faculty teaching time: a comparison of web-based and face-to-face graduate nursing courses.教师教学时间:基于网络的研究生护理课程与面对面研究生护理课程的比较
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5(1):Article2. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1539. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
8
Student perceptions of online lectures and WebCT in an introductory drug information course.药学信息入门课程中学生对在线讲座和网络课程工具(WebCT)的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Dec 15;70(6):126. doi: 10.5688/aj7006126.