Mogre Victor, Scherpbier Albert J J A, Stevens Fred, Aryee Paul, Cherry Mary Gemma, Dornan Tim
Department of Health Professions Education and Innovative Learning, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
Department of Educational Development & Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 21;6(10):e010084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010084.
To determine what, how, for whom, why, and in what circumstances educational interventions improve the delivery of nutrition care by doctors and other healthcare professionals work.
Realist synthesis following a published protocol and reported following Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines. A multidisciplinary team searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, EMBASE, PsyINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Science Direct for published and unpublished (grey) literature. The team identified studies with varied designs; appraised their ability to answer the review question; identified relationships between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes (CMOs); and entered them into a spreadsheet configured for the purpose. The final synthesis identified commonalities across CMO configurations.
Over half of the 46 studies from which we extracted data originated from the USA. Interventions that improved the delivery of nutrition care improved skills and attitudes rather than just knowledge; provided opportunities for superiors to model nutrition care; removed barriers to nutrition care in health systems; provided participants with local, practically relevant tools and messages; and incorporated non-traditional, innovative teaching strategies. Operating in contexts where student and qualified healthcare professionals provided nutrition care in developed and developing countries, these interventions yielded health outcomes by triggering a range of mechanisms, which included feeling competent, feeling confident and comfortable, having greater self-efficacy, being less inhibited by barriers in healthcare systems and feeling that nutrition care was accepted and recognised.
These findings show how important it is to move education for nutrition care beyond the simple acquisition of knowledge. They show how educational interventions embedded within systems of healthcare can improve patients' health by helping health students and professionals to appreciate the importance of delivering nutrition care and feel competent to deliver it.
确定教育干预措施在何种方面、以何种方式、针对何人、为何以及在何种情况下能改善医生和其他医疗保健专业人员提供营养护理的工作。
遵循已发表的方案进行实证综合,并按照实证与元叙事证据综合:不断发展的标准(RAMESES)指南进行报告。一个多学科团队在MEDLINE、CINAHL、ERIC、EMBASE、PsyINFO、社会学文摘、科学引文索引、谷歌学术和科学Direct中搜索已发表和未发表(灰色)文献。该团队确定了设计多样的研究;评估了它们回答综述问题的能力;确定了背景、机制和结果(CMO)之间的关系;并将它们输入为此目的配置的电子表格中。最终的综合分析确定了CMO配置中的共性。
我们从中提取数据的46项研究中,超过一半来自美国。改善营养护理提供的干预措施提高了技能和态度,而不仅仅是知识;为上级提供了示范营养护理的机会;消除了卫生系统中营养护理的障碍;为参与者提供了当地的、实际相关的工具和信息;并采用了非传统的创新教学策略。在发达国家和发展中国家,学生和合格的医疗保健专业人员提供营养护理的背景下,这些干预措施通过触发一系列机制产生了健康结果,这些机制包括感到有能力、自信和舒适,具有更强的自我效能感,较少受到医疗保健系统障碍的抑制,以及感到营养护理被接受和认可。
这些发现表明,将营养护理教育从单纯的知识获取中拓展出来是多么重要。它们表明,嵌入医疗保健系统的教育干预措施如何通过帮助健康专业学生和专业人员认识到提供营养护理的重要性并感到有能力提供营养护理,从而改善患者的健康状况。