López-Calleja M Victoria, Fernández María José, Bozinovic Francisco
Center for Advanced Studies in Ecology & Biodiversity and Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 651-3677, Chile.
J Exp Biol. 2003 Oct;206(Pt 19):3349-59. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00572.
Floral nectars are rich in energy but contain only traces of amino acids, and it has been hypothesized that arthropods may be an important source of energy and amino acids for hummingbirds. We studied the nitrogen requirements of hummingbirds as well as how they use small arthropods to satisfy their nitrogen and energy requirements and how organ mass varies with nitrogen intake. Non-reproductive green-backed firecrowns Sephanoides sephaniodes were maintained for 10 days on diets containing 0%, 0.96%, 1.82%, 4.11% and 11.1% nitrogen (dry-matter basis). A second group of individuals were fed with varying amounts of nitrogen-free nectar supplemented with fruit flies. Finally, non-reproductive hummingbirds were captured as a control group for analysis of organ mass and size as well as fat content. The maintenance nitrogen requirement of green-backed firecrowns determined by regression was 1.42 mg N day(-1), yet they required nearly 10 mg N day(-1) to maintain body mass. When arthropods were available, we observed that hummingbirds required approximately 150 fruit flies to maintain body mass, which corresponds to a 5% nitrogen diet. Interestingly, when nectar was restricted (to 4 ml day(-1)), or was absent, arthropods alone were not able to satisfy the body mass balance requirements of hummingbirds, suggesting that arthropods are not adequate as an energy source. In the group offered an 11.1% nitrogen diet, the size and surface of the small intestine, and liver and kidney mass increased in comparison with the control group (non-reproductive field hummingbirds) or the nitrogen-free group, suggesting a nitrogen overload. Our results are in agreement with other studies showing low nitrogen requirements by nectarivores. An important point to stress is that nitrogen digestibility declined in the 11.1% nitrogen diet, which strongly supports our nitrogen absorption saturation hypothesis.
花蜜富含能量,但仅含有微量氨基酸,因此有人推测节肢动物可能是蜂鸟重要的能量和氨基酸来源。我们研究了蜂鸟的氮需求,以及它们如何利用小型节肢动物来满足氮和能量需求,以及器官质量如何随氮摄入量而变化。非繁殖期的绿背冕蜂鸟(Sephanoides sephaniodes)被喂食含氮量分别为0%、0.96%、1.82%、4.11%和11.1%(干物质基础)的食物,持续10天。第二组个体被喂食不同量的不含氮花蜜,并添加果蝇。最后,捕获非繁殖期的蜂鸟作为对照组,用于分析器官质量、大小以及脂肪含量。通过回归分析确定,绿背冕蜂鸟维持生存所需的氮量为1.42毫克氮/天,但它们需要近10毫克氮/天来维持体重。当有节肢动物可获取时,我们观察到蜂鸟大约需要150只果蝇来维持体重,这相当于5%的氮饮食。有趣的是,当花蜜供应受限(至4毫升/天)或没有花蜜时,仅靠节肢动物无法满足蜂鸟的体重平衡需求,这表明节肢动物作为能量来源并不充足。在喂食11.1%氮饮食的组中,与对照组(非繁殖期野外蜂鸟)或无氮组相比,小肠的大小和表面积以及肝脏和肾脏质量增加,表明存在氮过载。我们的结果与其他显示食蜜动物氮需求较低的研究一致。需要强调的一个重要点是,在11.1%氮饮食中氮的消化率下降,这有力地支持了我们的氮吸收饱和假说。