• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门直肠内拖出术治疗先天性巨结肠:与开放手术技术的比较。

Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a comparison with the open technique.

作者信息

Hadidi A

机构信息

Pediatric Surgery Department, Cairo University, 32 Harroon Street, El Messaha, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt 12311.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):176-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41262.

DOI:10.1055/s-2003-41262
PMID:12939702
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the indications, results, and complications of Transanal Endorectal Pull-Through (TEPT) in the management of rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease (HD) compared with the open technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 1998 and March 2002, 68 Transanal Endorectal Pull-Through (TEPT) procedures were performed in infants and children. The patients' ages ranged from 6 days to 13 years. The primary diagnosis in all 68 patients was Hirschsprung's disease confined to the rectosigmoid region. All children were operated without construction of a pre-operative colostomy except for one patient. Follow-up period ranged from 6 - 46 months (mean 32 months). These patients were compared with fifty patients who had undergone open pull-through for HD during the period from November 1995 to October 1998.

RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS

For the TEPT group, the mean operating time was 90 min and the average length of resected bowel was 25 cm. Sixty-two patients had satisfactory results without complications. Blood transfusion was needed in eleven patients only. Recovery was very fast and patients were often hungry within 24 hours. Feeding was resumed within 48 hours. One patient required laparotomy during the procedure due to injury to the urethra. Two patients required colostomy 3 and 5 days after surgery because of delayed leakage. Three patients suffered from attacks of enterocolitis 6 - 9 months postoperatively. There was increased frequency of defecation (5 - 15 times daily) for 4 - 6 weeks after surgery in all patients. There was no constipation, no incontinence, no cuff abscess and no mortality in any of the patients. Average frequency of defecation was 1 - 3 times daily after 3 months postoperatively. For the open technique group, mean operating time was 150 min, the length of the average resected segment was 29 cm. Forty-one patients had satisfactory results without complications. The cost of the open technique was almost double that of the TEPT (6300 vs. 3200 pounds).

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal Endorectal Pull-Through (TEPT) is characterized by a shorter operating time, less bleeding, shorter hospital stay, less morbidity and earlier recovery than similar open pull-through procedures. The hazards and morbidities associated with laparotomy and colostomy may be avoided with a one-stage technique in Hirschsprung's disease confined to the rectosigmoid area (70-80 %). Careful long-term follow-up is required to assess continence and sexual function.

摘要

目的

评估经肛门直肠内拖出术(TEPT)治疗乙状结肠直肠型先天性巨结肠(HD)的适应症、疗效及并发症,并与开放手术技术进行比较。

患者与方法

1998年11月至2002年3月期间,对婴儿和儿童实施了68例经肛门直肠内拖出术(TEPT)。患者年龄从6天至13岁不等。所有68例患者的初步诊断均为局限于乙状结肠直肠区域的先天性巨结肠。除1例患者外,所有儿童均未进行术前结肠造口术而直接接受手术。随访期为6 - 46个月(平均32个月)。将这些患者与1995年11月至1998年10月期间接受HD开放拖出术的50例患者进行比较。

结果与并发症

TEPT组的平均手术时间为90分钟,平均切除肠段长度为25厘米。62例患者效果满意,无并发症。仅11例患者需要输血。恢复非常快,患者通常在24小时内就有饥饿感。48小时内恢复进食。1例患者在手术过程中因尿道损伤需要开腹手术。2例患者术后3天和5天因延迟渗漏需要进行结肠造口术。3例患者术后6 - 9个月发生小肠结肠炎发作。所有患者术后4 - 6周排便次数增加(每天5 - 15次)。所有患者均无便秘、失禁、袖口脓肿,也无死亡病例。术后3个月后平均排便频率为每天1 - 3次。开放手术组的平均手术时间为150分钟,平均切除肠段长度为29厘米。41例患者效果满意,无并发症。开放手术的费用几乎是TEPT的两倍(6300英镑对3200英镑)。

结论

经肛门直肠内拖出术(TEPT)与类似的开放拖出手术相比,具有手术时间短、出血少、住院时间短、发病率低和恢复早的特点。对于局限于乙状结肠直肠区域(70 - 80%)的先天性巨结肠,采用一期手术技术可避免与开腹手术和结肠造口术相关的风险和发病率。需要进行仔细的长期随访以评估控便能力和性功能。

相似文献

1
Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a comparison with the open technique.经肛门直肠内拖出术治疗先天性巨结肠:与开放手术技术的比较。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):176-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41262.
2
Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: experience with 68 patients.经肛门直肠内拖出术治疗先天性巨结肠:68例患者的经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Sep;38(9):1337-40. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00392-0.
3
Single-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: perspective from a developing country.先天性巨结肠的单阶段经肛门直肠内拖出术:来自一个发展中国家的视角
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Mar;42(3):532-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.10.049.
4
Our experience with transanal endorectal pull-through in Hirschsprung's disease.我们在先天性巨结肠症中经肛门直肠内拖出术的经验。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Oct;17(5):335-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965447.
5
Transanal endorectal pull-through in children with Hirschsprung's disease--technical refinements and comparison of results with the Duhamel procedure.先天性巨结肠患儿经肛门直肠内拖出术——技术改进及与杜哈梅尔手术结果的比较
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Apr;44(4):767-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.002.
6
Transanal coloanal pull-through with a short muscular cuff for classic Hirschsprung's disease.经肛门结肠肛管拖出术联合短肌袖治疗典型先天性巨结肠症。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):181-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41264.
7
Transanal coloanal anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease: comparison between endorectal and perirectal pull-through procedures.经肛门结肠肛管吻合术治疗先天性巨结肠:直肠内拖出术与直肠周围拖出术的比较
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Oct;16(5):312-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924523.
8
Transanal one-stage endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease in infants and children.婴幼儿及儿童先天性巨结肠经肛门一期直肠内拖出术
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Feb;38(2):184-7. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50039.
9
A new modification of transanal Soave pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung's disease.一种用于先天性巨结肠症的经肛门Soave拖出术的新改良方法。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Jan 5;119(1):37-42.
10
[Transanal endorectal pull-through with short muscular cuff in the treatment of Hirschsprung disease. Preliminary study with 37 patients].[经肛门直肠内拖出术加短肌袖治疗先天性巨结肠。37例患者的初步研究]
Cir Pediatr. 2003 Oct;16(4):161-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Transanal endorectal or transabdominal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease; which is better? A systematic review and meta-analysis.经肛门直肠内或经腹腔拖出术治疗先天性巨结肠:哪一种更好?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Jan 24;39(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05378-1.
2
The Prevalence and Clinical Profile of Hirschsprung's Disease at a Tertiary Hospital in Bahrain.巴林一家三级医院先天性巨结肠病的患病率及临床特征
Cureus. 2021 Jan 4;13(1):e12480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12480.
3
Outcome of transanal endorectal vs. transabdominal pull-through in patients with Hirschsprung's disease.
经肛门直肠内与经腹拖出术治疗先天性巨结肠病患者的结局比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Oct;396(7):1027-33. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0804-9. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
4
Long-term outcome of children after single-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease.经肛门内镜微创根治术治疗先天性巨结肠患儿的长期疗效。
World J Pediatr. 2011 Feb;7(1):65-9. doi: 10.1007/s12519-011-0247-y. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
5
Is the Rehbein procedure obsolete in the treatment of Hirschsprung's disease?赖贝因手术在先天性巨结肠的治疗中是否过时了?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Nov;26(11):1117-20. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2696-0.