Re-evaluating revalidation and appraisal.
作者信息
Pringle Mike
出版信息
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jun;53(491):437-8.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Re-evaluating revalidation and appraisal.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jun;53(491):437-8.
2
Opening Pandora's box.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jul;53(492):566.
3
The management of poor performance.
Postgrad Med J. 2007 Feb;83(976):105-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.040758.
4
How to assess your specialist registrar.
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Dec;89(12):1089-93. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.043232.
5
Personnel appraisal.
Br J Hosp Med. 1995;53(4):162-5.
6
[Evaluation of the quality of professional activities of military specialists].
Voen Med Zh. 1985 Jul(7):47-9.
7
The struggling resident: avoiding Pygmalion and learned helplessness by using nontechnical performance assessment systems.
Anesthesiology. 2010 May;112(5):1067-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d403bf.
8
Professional development. Part 5: Performance evaluation.
EMS Mag. 2009 Jun;38(6):63-4.
9
Employee performance: for the good of all.
Nurs Manage. 2009 Apr;40(4):24-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000349686.01295.b5.
10
Staff development through appraisal.
Nurs Times. 2001;97(39):34-5.
引用本文的文献
1
The Evolving Purposes of Medical Revalidation in the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Study of Professional and Regulatory Narratives.
Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):642-647. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001993.
2
The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice.
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 20;17:84. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0489-9.
3
Revalidation: the purpose needs to be clear.
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):684-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.684.
4
Practice, supervision, consultancy and appraisal: a continuum of learning.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Aug;53(493):662-5.
5
What is a father?
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Aug;53(493):660-1.
6
Reconciling the head and the heart.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Aug;53(493):657.
本文引用的文献
1
Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jun;53(491):454-60.
2
A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jun;53(491):446-53.
3
Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome.
Lancet. 2003 Apr 19;361(9366):1319-25. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13077-2.
4
Outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: case report.
BMJ. 2003 Apr 19;326(7394):850-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.850.
5
Work based assessment.
BMJ. 2003 Apr 5;326(7392):753-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.753.
6
From no interest to special interest--a personal reflection on the RCGP certificate in substance misuse.
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Oct;52(483):866.
7
General practitioners with special clinical interests: a cross-sectional survey.
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Oct;52(483):833-4.
8
The general practitioner with a special interest: new opportunities or the end of the generalist practitioner?
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Oct;52(483):796-8.
9
Patients' decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study.
BMJ. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):873. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.873.
10
Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care.
Lancet Oncol. 2002 Oct;3(10):629-37. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00877-x.
Zotero 插件