• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨医疗保健研究中“患者”角色的演变:参与共同决策试验后的思考

Evolving the multiple roles of 'patients' in health-care research: reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making.

作者信息

Thornton Hazel, Edwards Adrian, Elwyn Glyn

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):189-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00231.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00231.x
PMID:12940792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060182/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This paper offers 'consumer-led' reflections by steering group members of a patient-centred research study involving consumer advocates, patients' associations and patients, throughout the whole study, from pre- to post-study phases. ORIGINAL STUDY DESIGN: The study: 'Shared decision making and risk communication in general practice' incorporated systematic reviews, psychometric evaluation of outcome measures, and quantitative, qualitative and health economic analyses of a cluster randomized trial of professional skill development, all informed by consumer and patient engagement.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The work was produced by a wide collaboration led by researchers from the Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, including a consumers' advisory group and a patients' association. The study participants were 20 general practitioners from Gwent, their practice staff, and almost 800 patients at these practices.

DISCUSSION

Consumers and patients contributed to several stages of the research from inception and design, securing of funding, implementation of the protocol, and interpretation and dissemination of the findings. 'Patient involvement' research initiatives that include an equally wide variety of 'user' participants as 'health-professional' participants, accountable to a 'Health in Partnership' funded project, require a user-led viewpoint to be presented and disseminated. This paper presents reflections on the processes of the research, the interpretations of study findings by the involved parties, and notes how this model is fundamental to effective research in the field of patient-centred health care if future practice, policy and research are to change.

摘要

目的

本文呈现了以患者为中心的研究指导小组成员的“消费者主导”反思。该研究涵盖消费者倡导者、患者协会和患者,涉及从研究前到研究后的整个阶段。

原始研究设计

“全科医疗中的共同决策与风险沟通”研究纳入了系统评价、结果测量的心理测量评估,以及专业技能发展整群随机试验的定量、定性和健康经济分析,所有这些均受到消费者和患者参与的影响。

背景与参与者

这项工作是由威尔士大学医学院全科医学系的研究人员牵头进行的广泛合作成果,其中包括一个消费者咨询小组和一个患者协会。研究参与者包括来自格温特郡的20名全科医生及其执业人员,以及这些诊所的近800名患者。

讨论

消费者和患者参与了研究的多个阶段,从研究的启动和设计、资金的获取、方案的实施,到研究结果的解读与传播。“患者参与”研究倡议包含与“健康专业人员”参与者数量相当的各类“用户”参与者,由“伙伴关系中的健康”资助项目负责,需要呈现并传播用户主导的观点。本文对研究过程、相关方对研究结果的解读进行了反思,并指出如果未来的实践、政策和研究要有所改变,这种模式对于以患者为中心的医疗保健领域的有效研究至关重要。

相似文献

1
Evolving the multiple roles of 'patients' in health-care research: reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making.探讨医疗保健研究中“患者”角色的演变:参与共同决策试验后的思考
Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):189-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00231.x.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.实现参与:一项关于全科医疗中共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验的过程结果
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):337-46. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh401.
6
Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.基于患者的结局,来自一项在全科医疗中开展的关于共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验。
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):347-54. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh402.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation.探索医患双方对于会诊中风险沟通和共同决策的看法。
Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):198-207. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00235.x.
9
10
Selecting, refining and identifying priority Cochrane Reviews in health communication and participation in partnership with consumers and other stakeholders.选择、精炼和确定与消费者及其他利益攸关方合作的健康传播领域中的优先 Cochrane 综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 29;17(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0444-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitating choice when engaging young people with disabilities: reflections from co-researcher training.在与残疾青年接触时促进选择:来自共同研究者培训的反思
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 26;10(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00626-7.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
The value, challenges and practical considerations of conducting qualitative research on antimicrobial stewardship in primary care.在初级保健中开展抗菌药物管理定性研究的价值、挑战及实际考量
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar 16;4(2):dlac026. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac026. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
5
Needs-led research: a way of employing user involvement when devising research questions on the trust model in community home-based health care services in Norway.需求导向型研究:在挪威社区居家医疗服务信任模式研究问题设计中运用用户参与的一种方式。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 22;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00291-0.
6
Perspectives on public involvement in health research from Singapore: The potential of a supported group model of involvement.新加坡公众参与健康研究的观点:支持小组参与模式的潜力。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1074-1085. doi: 10.1111/hex.13058. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
7
Reasons given by pregnant women for participating in a clinical trial aimed at preventing premature delivery: a qualitative analysis.孕妇参与旨在预防早产的临床试验的原因:定性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Mar 20;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2240-8.
8
The extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in primary care research: a mixed methods study.患者及公众参与基层医疗研究的程度、质量及影响:一项混合方法研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 24;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0100-8. eCollection 2018.
9
Moving towards a more inclusive patient and public involvement in health research paradigm: the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis.迈向更具包容性的患者和公众参与健康研究范式:纳入创伤知情的交叉性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2463-1.
10
The need for patient-centred clinical research in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.特发性肺纤维化中以患者为中心的临床研究的必要性。
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 24;13:240. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0475-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of COMRADE--a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations.COMRADE的开发——一种基于患者的结果测量工具,用于评估会诊中风险沟通和治疗决策的有效性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jul;50(3):311-22. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00055-7.
2
A comparison of risk perception and psychological morbidity in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early invasive breast cancer.导管原位癌和早期浸润性乳腺癌女性的风险认知与心理疾病比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Feb;77(3):285-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1021853302033.
3
Ten ways to improve information technology in the NHS.改善英国国家医疗服务体系信息技术的十种方法。
BMJ. 2003 Jan 25;326(7382):202-6.
4
Participating in primary care research.参与初级保健研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Dec;52(485):971-2.
5
The clinical encounter--the focal point of patient-centred care.临床问诊——以患者为中心的医疗护理的核心要点。
Health Expect. 2002 Dec;5(4):279-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00198.x.
6
Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult.质量改进报告:通过将随机试验嵌入定性研究来改进其设计与实施:前列腺癌检测与治疗(ProtecT)研究。评论:向患者提供无偏信息可能具有挑战性。
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):766-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766.
7
Why men with prostate cancer want wider access to prostate specific antigen testing: qualitative study.前列腺癌男性患者希望更广泛地进行前列腺特异性抗原检测的原因:定性研究
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):737. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.737.
8
Prostate specific antigen testing for prostate cancer.用于前列腺癌的前列腺特异性抗原检测。
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):725-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.725.
9
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: consumer involvement in design of new randomised controlled trial.急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗:消费者参与新随机对照试验的设计
BMJ. 2002 Aug 24;325(7361):415. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7361.415.
10
Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?心血管风险筛查:是公共卫生的当务之急还是个人知情选择的问题?
BMJ. 2002 Jul 13;325(7355):78-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7355.78.