Suppr超能文献

女性与医生在激素治疗决策冲突方面得分差异的相关因素:一项多层次回归分析。

Factors associated with the difference in score between women's and doctors' decisional conflict about hormone therapy: a multilevel regression analysis.

作者信息

Légaré France, Tremblay Stéphane, O'Connor Annette M, Graham Ian D, Wells Georges A, Jacobsen Mary Jane

机构信息

Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):208-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00234.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore factors associated with the difference in score between women's and doctors' decisional conflict about hormone therapy (HT).

DESIGN

Secondary analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

family doctors were randomized to prepare women for counselling about HT using either a decision aid or a pamphlet.

MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED

After each counselling session, decisional conflict was assessed in women and doctors using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) and the Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument (PDPAI), respectively. The difference in score between the DCS and PDPAI was computed and entered as the dependent variable in a multilevel regression analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME RESULTS

A total of 40 doctors and 167 women were included in the analysis. The intra-doctor correlation coefficient was 0.25. Factors associated with women experiencing higher decisional conflict than their doctor were: age of doctor >45 years, women who were undecided about the best choice after the counselling session, women with a university degree and women who said that their doctor usually does not give them control over treatment decision. Factors associated with doctors experiencing more decisional conflict than women were: doctors who were undecided about the quality of the decision, length of visit <30 min and women who thought that the decision was shared with their doctor.

CONCLUSION

In order to reduce the disparities between women's and doctors' decisional conflict about HT, interventions aimed at raising awareness of doctors about shared decision-making should be encouraged.

摘要

目的

探讨与女性和医生在激素疗法(HT)决策冲突得分差异相关的因素。

设计

二次分析。

设置与参与者

家庭医生被随机分配,使用决策辅助工具或宣传册为女性提供HT咨询准备。

研究的主要变量

每次咨询会后,分别使用决策冲突量表(DCS)和提供者决策过程评估工具(PDPAI)对女性和医生的决策冲突进行评估。计算DCS和PDPAI得分的差异,并将其作为多水平回归分析中的因变量。

主要结果

共有40名医生和167名女性纳入分析。医生内部相关系数为0.25。与女性相比,决策冲突较高的相关因素有:医生年龄>45岁、咨询会后对最佳选择仍未决定的女性、拥有大学学位的女性以及表示医生通常不让她们控制治疗决策的女性。与医生相比,决策冲突较高的相关因素有:对决策质量仍未决定的医生、就诊时间<30分钟以及认为决策是与医生共同做出的女性。

结论

为了减少女性和医生在HT决策冲突方面的差异,应鼓励采取旨在提高医生对共同决策认识的干预措施。

相似文献

3
Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Sep 3;47(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0297-4.
4
Structured shared decision-making using dialogue and visualization: a randomized controlled trial.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jan;90(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
5
Decisional Quality in Patients With Small Renal Masses.
Urology. 2018 Jun;116:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
6
Decision-Making Quality in Parents Considering Adenotonsillectomy or Tympanostomy Tube Insertion for Their Children.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):260-266. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3365.
7
Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1478-4.
9
"It's my body'': does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict?
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):522-32. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306782. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
10
Facing the decision about the treatment of hip or knee osteoarthritis: What are patients' needs?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 May;24(5):1710-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-3993-5. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013385.pub2.
2
Association of shared decision making with inpatient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jan 25;21(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01385-1.
4
Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551638. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
6
Using decision aids in community-based primary care: a theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):490-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.040. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

3
Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):93-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.93.
4
Women's decision-making about their health care: views over the life cycle.
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Dec;48(3):225-31. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00175-1.
5
Medical students, clinical preventive services, and shared decision-making.
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1160-1. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00026.
6
An evidence-based approach to managing women's decisional conflict.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002 Sep-Oct;31(5):570-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00083.x.
9
The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.
J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804.
10
The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction.
Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jan;39(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00090-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验