Suppr超能文献

动力学区分流感血凝素融合和半融合机制

Kinetically differentiating influenza hemagglutinin fusion and hemifusion machines.

作者信息

Mittal Aditya, Leikina Eugenia, Chernomordik Leonid V, Bentz Joe

机构信息

Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

Biophys J. 2003 Sep;85(3):1713-24. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74601-3.

Abstract

Membrane fusion mediated by influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) yields different phenotypes depending on the surface density of activated HAs. A key question is whether different phenotypes arise from different fusion machines or whether different numbers of identical fusion machines yield different probabilistic outcomes. If fusion were simply a less probable event than hemifusion, requiring a larger number of identical fusion machines to occur first, then two predictions can be made. First, fusion should have a shorter average delay time than hemifusion, since there are more machines. Second, fusion should have a longer execution time of lipid mixing after it begins than hemifusion, since the full event cannot be faster than the partial event. Using a new automated video microscopy technique, we simultaneously monitored many HA-expressing cells fusing with erythrocytes and identified individual cell pairs with either full or only partial redistribution of fluorescent lipids. The full lipid mixing phenotype also showed contents mixing, i.e., fusion. Kinetic screening of the digitized fluorescence data showed that the execution of lipid mixing after the onset is faster for fusion than hemifusion. We found no correlation between the delay times before the onset of lipid mixing and the final fusion phenotype. We also found that the execution time for fusion was faster than that for hemifusion. Thus, we provide the first experimental evidence for fusion and hemifusion arising from different machines.

摘要

由流感病毒血凝素(HA)介导的膜融合会产生不同的表型,这取决于活化HA的表面密度。一个关键问题是,不同的表型是源于不同的融合机器,还是相同融合机器数量的不同产生了不同的概率结果。如果融合仅仅是比半融合可能性更小的事件,需要首先出现更多相同的融合机器,那么可以做出两个预测。首先,融合的平均延迟时间应该比半融合短,因为有更多的机器。其次,融合开始后脂质混合的执行时间应该比半融合长,因为完整事件不可能比部分事件更快。使用一种新的自动视频显微镜技术,我们同时监测了许多表达HA的细胞与红细胞的融合,并识别出荧光脂质完全或仅部分重新分布的单个细胞对。完全脂质混合表型也显示了内容物混合,即融合。对数字化荧光数据的动力学筛选表明,融合开始后脂质混合的执行速度比半融合快。我们发现脂质混合开始前的延迟时间与最终融合表型之间没有相关性。我们还发现融合的执行时间比半融合快。因此,我们为不同机器产生融合和半融合提供了首个实验证据。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Architecture of the influenza hemagglutinin membrane fusion site.流感血凝素膜融合位点的结构
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Jul 11;1614(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(03)00160-3.
8
Membrane fusion: stalk model revisited.膜融合:柄模型再探讨
Biophys J. 2002 Feb;82(2):693-712. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75432-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验