• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

繁忙急诊科中的差错

Errors in a busy emergency department.

作者信息

Fordyce James, Blank Fidela S j, Pekow Penelope, Smithline Howard A, Ritter George, Gehlbach Stephen, Benjamin Evan, Henneman Philip L

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA 01199, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Sep;42(3):324-33. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00398-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00398-6
PMID:12944883
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We describe errors occurring in a busy ED.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational study of reported errors at an academic emergency department (ED) with 100000 annual visits. Trained personnel interviewed all ED staff with direct patient contact, during and at the end of every shift, by using standardized data sheets.

RESULTS

One thousand nine hundred thirty-five ED patients registered during the 7-day study period in the summer of 2001. Four hundred error reports were generated, identifying 346 nonduplicative errors (18 per 100 registered patients; 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.9 to 20.0). Forty percent of errors were reported by nurses, 25% by providers, 19% by clerical staff, 13% by technicians and orderlies, and 3% multiple reporters. Errors reported for every 100 hours worked were similar for all groups (5.5; 95% CI 5.2 to 5.9). Errors were categorized as 22% diagnostic studies, 16% administrative procedures, 16% pharmacotherapy, 13% documentation, 12% communication, 11% environmental, and 9% other. Patients involved in errors were more likely to be older (P <.0001) and more likely to have higher visit level intensity (P <.0001) than registered ED patients. Ninety-eight percent of errors did not have a significant adverse outcome. Seven errors (0.36 per 100 registered patients; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.72) were associated with an adverse outcome.

CONCLUSION

Reported errors occurred in almost every aspect of emergency care. Ninety-eight percent of errors in the ED do not result in adverse outcomes. System changes need to be implemented to reduce ED errors.

摘要

研究目的

我们描述了繁忙急诊科中发生的差错。

方法

这是一项对一家年就诊量达100000人次的学术性急诊科上报差错进行的前瞻性观察研究。经过培训的人员在每个班次期间及结束时,使用标准化数据表对所有与患者有直接接触的急诊科工作人员进行访谈。

结果

在2001年夏季为期7天的研究期间,有1935名急诊科患者登记就诊。共产生了400份差错报告,识别出346个非重复差错(每100名登记患者中有18个;95%置信区间[CI]为15.9至20.0)。40%的差错由护士上报,25%由医疗服务提供者上报,19%由文职人员上报,13%由技术人员和勤杂工上报,3%由多名上报者上报。所有组每工作100小时上报的差错数相似(5.5;95%CI为5.2至5.9)。差错分类如下:诊断性检查占22%,行政程序占16%,药物治疗占16%,文件记录占13%,沟通占12%,环境因素占11%,其他占9%。与登记的急诊科患者相比,发生差错的患者年龄更大(P<.0001),就诊级别强度更高的可能性也更大(P<.0001)。98%的差错未产生显著不良后果。7个差错(每100名登记患者中有0.36个;95%CI为0.14至0.72)与不良后果相关。

结论

上报的差错几乎发生在急诊护理的各个方面。急诊科98%的差错未导致不良后果。需要实施系统变革以减少急诊科差错。

相似文献

1
Errors in a busy emergency department.繁忙急诊科中的差错
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Sep;42(3):324-33. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00398-6.
2
Assessing the rates of error and adverse events in the ED.评估急诊科的差错率和不良事件发生率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;33(12):1786-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.042. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
3
Communication of Vital Signs at Emergency Department Handoff: Opportunities for Improvement.急诊科交接班时生命体征的传达:改进的机会。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;66(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.02.025. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
4
Unscheduled returns to the emergency department: an outcome of medical errors?非计划重返急诊科:是医疗差错的一种结果吗?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr;15(2):102-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016618.
5
Errors, near misses and adverse events in the emergency department: what can patients tell us?急诊科的差错、险些失误及不良事件:患者能告诉我们什么?
CJEM. 2008 Sep;10(5):421-7. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500010484.
6
Do emergency physicians attribute drug-related emergency department visits to medication-related problems?急诊医师是否将与药物相关的急诊就诊归因于与药物相关的问题?
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;55(6):493-502.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
7
On-site pharmacists in the ED improve medical errors.急诊室的现场药师可改善医疗差错。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):717-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
8
Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits.返回急诊科就诊患者的不良事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):142-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003194. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
9
Medication prescribing errors in the prehospital setting and in the ED.院前和急诊科的用药处方错误。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.04.023. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
10
Safety climate and medical errors in 62 US emergency departments.62 家美国急诊科的安全氛围与医疗差错。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;60(5):555-563.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying diagnostic errors in the emergency department using trigger-based strategies.使用基于触发机制的策略识别急诊科的诊断错误。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Aug 6;14(3):e003389. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003389.
2
Predicting Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level, hospital admission, and admitting ward in an emergency department using data-driven machine learning.使用数据驱动的机器学习预测急诊科的急诊严重程度指数(ESI)级别、住院情况及收治科室。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02941-9.
3
Residents, Interrupted: A Blinded, Prospective Observational Study of Emergency Medicine Resident Workflow.
住院医师工作被打断:一项关于急诊医学住院医师工作流程的双盲前瞻性观察研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jun 23;9(3):e70065. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70065. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Aspiring to clinical significance: Insights from developing and evaluating a machine learning model to predict emergency department return visit admissions.追求临床意义:开发和评估用于预测急诊科复诊入院的机器学习模型所获见解
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Sep 27;3(9):e0000606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000606. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Stroke in Emergency Departments.基于机器学习的急诊科中风预测
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Apr 1;17:17562864241239108. doi: 10.1177/17562864241239108. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparison of Ordering Tools on Adherence to Treatment Protocols in the Emergency Department.比较在急诊科中使用医嘱工具对治疗方案依从性的影响。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:739-745. eCollection 2022.
7
Not Like the Textbook: An Atypical Case of Ectopic Pregnancy.与教科书不同:一例异位妊娠的非典型病例
Cureus. 2022 Oct 3;14(10):e29881. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29881. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study.在加拿大急诊部门中对患者安全事件报告的信仰和看法:一项定性研究。
CJEM. 2022 Dec;24(8):867-875. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
9
How safe are paediatric emergency departments? A national prospective cohort study.儿科急诊科有多安全?一项全国性前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Oct 19;31(11):806-817. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014608.
10
Hospital Pharmacists Interventions to Drug-Related Problems at Tertiary Critical Care Pediatric Settings in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉赞三级重症儿科环境中医院药剂师对药物相关问题的干预措施
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Feb;57(1):146-153. doi: 10.1177/0018578721990889. Epub 2021 Feb 6.