• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赋权作为治疗方法以及卫生专业人员的作用。

Empowerment as treatment and the role of health professionals.

作者信息

Powers Penny

机构信息

South Dakota State University College of Nursing, Brookings, SD 57007-0098, USA.

出版信息

ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2003 Jul-Sep;26(3):227-37. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200307000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00012272-200307000-00007
PMID:12945657
Abstract

This article argues that the concept of empowerment has been co-opted by health professionals and redefined as an intervention to produce compliance. Patients are considered empowered by health professionals only if they make the correct choices as defined by the health care provider. Patients are not informed about all possible choices and are not free to make their own choices for their own reasons. Empowerment is a coercive strategy that is justified by its outcomes and creates dependent populations.

摘要

本文认为,赋权概念已被医疗专业人员挪用,并重新定义为一种促使患者依从的干预措施。只有当患者做出医疗服务提供者所定义的正确选择时,医疗专业人员才会认为患者获得了赋权。患者并未被告知所有可能的选择,也无法出于自身原因自由做出自己的选择。赋权是一种以结果为正当理由的强制性策略,它造就了依赖他人的人群。

相似文献

1
Empowerment as treatment and the role of health professionals.赋权作为治疗方法以及卫生专业人员的作用。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2003 Jul-Sep;26(3):227-37. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200307000-00007.
2
Health literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: the importance of separating conjoined twins.健康素养和健康传播中的患者赋权:将连体双胞胎分开的重要性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jan;90(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
3
An analysis of the concept of empowerment.对赋权概念的分析。
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Feb;23(2):305-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb02672.x.
4
Myth of empowerment in chronic illness.慢性病中的赋权神话。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Jun;34(5):574-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01786.x.
5
Factoring ethnic and racial differences into bioethics decision making.将种族和民族差异纳入生物伦理决策。
Generations. 1994 Winter;18(4):23-6.
6
What are parents' perspectives on psychological empowerment in the MMR vaccination decision? A focus group study.父母对于MMR疫苗接种决策中心理赋权的看法是怎样的?一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 15;6(4):e010773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010773.
7
Indirect effects of contextual factors on patients' consultations with healthcare professionals about health information found online.情境因素对患者就网上获取的健康信息与医疗保健专业人员进行咨询的间接影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1713-y.
8
Self-care: re-thinking the role of compliance.自我护理:重新思考依从性的作用。
Aust J Adv Nurs. 1997 Sep-Nov;15(1):20-5.
9
Adherence: a matter of self-efficacy and power.依从性:自我效能与力量的问题。
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Jul;26(1):132-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026132.x.
10
Concept analysis of adherence in the context of cardiovascular risk reduction.心血管疾病风险降低背景下依从性的概念分析
Nurs Forum. 2009 Jan-Mar;44(1):25-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2009.00124.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing the Unpredictable - Discourses of Power and Knowledge in Mental Health Risk Management.应对不可预测之事——心理健康风险管理中的权力与知识话语
Nurs Inq. 2025 Jul;32(3):e70032. doi: 10.1111/nin.70032.
2
The right place? Users and professionals' constructions of the place's influence on personal recovery in community mental health services.合适的场所?使用者与专业人员对社区精神卫生服务中场所对个人康复影响的建构
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 May 31;12:26. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0209-z. eCollection 2018.
3
Do online communities change power processes in healthcare? Using case studies to examine the use of online health communities by patients with Parkinson's disease.
在线社区会改变医疗保健中的权力流程吗?利用案例研究考察帕金森病患者对在线健康社区的使用情况。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 7;6(11):e012110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012110.
4
The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials.电子患者门户对患者护理的影响:对照试验的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 26;14(6):e162. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2238.
5
Seeking connections, creating movement: the power of altruistic action.寻求联系,创造行动:利他行为的力量。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Dec;22(4):366-84. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0222-3.
6
Subject to empowerment: the constitution of power in an educational program for health professionals.受赋权影响:卫生专业人员教育项目中的权力构成
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Aug;16(3):443-55. doi: 10.1007/s11019-012-9412-x.
7
After colonic surgery: The lived experience of participating in a fast-track programme.结直肠手术后:参与快速康复计划的体验。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2009 Sep 1;4:170-80. doi: 10.1080/17482620903027726.
8
Persuasion and coercion: a critical review of philosophical and empirical approaches.说服与 coercion:对哲学和实证方法的批判性综述。(注:原文中“coercion”未翻译,可能是有遗漏信息,正常应译为“强制”之类的词)
HEC Forum. 2007 Jun;19(2):125-43. doi: 10.1007/s10730-007-9035-4.
9
Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness.患者对在线电子病历的感知有用性:运用扎根理论开发供慢性病患者使用的信息通信技术
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):306-14. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1712. Epub 2005 Jan 31.