• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻求联系,创造行动:利他行为的力量。

Seeking connections, creating movement: the power of altruistic action.

作者信息

Abma Tineke A, Baur Vivianne

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, Emgo+ Research Institute for Health and Primary Care Research, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2014 Dec;22(4):366-84. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0222-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-012-0222-3
PMID:22983776
Abstract

Participation of older people in designing and improving the care and services provided in residential care settings is limited. Traditional forms of democratic representation, such as client councils, and consumer models are management-driven. An alternative way of involving older people in the decisions over their lives, grounded in notions of care ethics and deliberative democracy, was explored by action research. In line with this tradition older people engage in collective action to enhance the control over their lives and those of others. In this article the theoretical background of altruistic action is presented and illustrated by a case example of a group of older women who changed the food policies within their residential home. Altruistic action is the joint and coordinated action by a group of clients based on their agenda. Such action is given in by a shared dissatisfaction and search for connections. Altruistic action may enhance the sense of self, belonging and ownership, and create a transformative movement enhancing the wellbeing and community life in residential settings.

摘要

老年人参与设计和改进寄宿护理机构所提供的护理和服务的程度有限。传统的民主代表形式,如客户委员会,以及消费者模式都是由管理层驱动的。行动研究探索了一种基于关怀伦理和协商民主理念,让老年人参与决定自己生活的替代方式。按照这一传统,老年人参与集体行动以增强对自己及他人生活的掌控。本文介绍了利他行动的理论背景,并通过一群老年女性改变其寄宿家庭食物政策的案例进行说明。利他行动是一群客户基于自身议程采取的联合与协调行动。这种行动源于共同的不满和对联系的探寻。利他行动可能会增强自我意识、归属感和主人翁意识,并引发一场变革运动,提升寄宿环境中的幸福感和社区生活质量。

相似文献

1
Seeking connections, creating movement: the power of altruistic action.寻求联系,创造行动:利他行为的力量。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Dec;22(4):366-84. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0222-3.
2
User involvement in long-term care. Towards a relational care-ethics approach.用户参与长期护理。迈向关系性护理伦理方法。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2328-39. doi: 10.1111/hex.12202. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
3
"I stand alone." An ethnodrama about the (dis)connections between a client and professionals in a residential care home.“我独自站立。”一部关于养老院中一位服务对象与专业人员之间(无)联系的民族志戏剧。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Sep;22(3):272-91. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0203-6.
4
Legal rights of client councils and their role in policy of long-term care organisations in the Netherlands.客户顾问的法律权利及其在荷兰长期护理组织政策中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 12;11:215. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-215.
5
Using participatory approaches with older people in a residential home in Guyana: challenges and tensions.在圭亚那一家养老院中与老年人采用参与式方法:挑战与矛盾
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2013 Mar;28(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10823-012-9182-1.
6
'Troubled conscience related to deficiencies in providing individualised meal schedule in residential care for older people--a participatory action research study'.与在老年人寄宿照料机构中提供个性化用餐时间表方面存在的不足相关的良心困扰——一项参与式行动研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec;29(4):688-96. doi: 10.1111/scs.12197. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
7
Residential care facilities: a key sector in the spectrum of long-term care providers in the United States.寄宿护理机构:美国长期护理服务提供商体系中的一个关键领域。
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Dec(78):1-8.
8
Ownership and quality of care in residential facilities for the elderly.老年住宅设施的所有权与护理质量。
Gerontologist. 1989 Apr;29(2):209-15. doi: 10.1093/geront/29.2.209.
9
The measure and discuss intervention: a procedure for client empowerment and quality control in residential care homes.
Gerontologist. 1997 Dec;37(6):817-22. doi: 10.1093/geront/37.6.817.
10
Mutual powerlessness in client participation practices in mental health care.在心理健康护理中,客户参与实践中的相互无力感。
Health Expect. 2014 Apr;17(2):208-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00748.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a person-centred care environment aiming to enhance the autonomy of nursing home residents with physical impairments, a descriptive study.旨在增强身体功能受损的养老院居民自主性的以患者为中心的护理环境的开发,描述性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Nov 15;23(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04434-8.
2
Work immersion and perceived stress among clinical nurses: a latent profile analysis and moderated mediation analysis.临床护士的工作沉浸感与感知压力:一项潜在剖面分析和调节中介分析
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 2;22(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01467-7.
3
Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization.

本文引用的文献

1
Relational responsibilities in responsive evaluation.
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Feb;35(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
2
Responsibilities in elderly care: Mr Powell's narrative of duty and relations.老年护理责任:鲍威尔先生的责任与关系叙述。
Bioethics. 2012 Jan;26(1):22-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01898.x. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
3
Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team.合作与共同拥有研究成果:研究团队中患者研究伙伴与专业研究人员之间的动态与对话。
参与式健康研究的社会影响:知识动员的协作式非线性过程
Educ Action Res. 2017;25(4):489-505. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092. Epub 2017 May 25.
4
Psychiatric Comorbidities and Environmental Triggers in Patients with Chronic Daily Headache: A Lifestyle Study.慢性每日头痛患者的精神共病与环境诱因:一项生活方式研究
Iran J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;12(1):29-35.
5
Am I My Brother's Keeper? Moral Dimensions of Informal Caregiving in a Neoliberal Society.我是我兄弟的守护者吗?新自由主义社会中非正式照料的道德维度。
Health Care Anal. 2017 Dec;25(4):323-337. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0313-7.
6
User involvement in long-term care. Towards a relational care-ethics approach.用户参与长期护理。迈向关系性护理伦理方法。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2328-39. doi: 10.1111/hex.12202. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
Health Expect. 2012 Sep;15(3):242-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
4
Developing voice and empowerment: the first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting.发展声音和赋权:广泛参与研究议程制定的第一步。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Apr;55(4):411-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01388.x. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
5
Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.患者参与作为对话:设定研究议程。
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):160-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x.
6
Participation of marginalized groups in evaluation: mission impossible?边缘化群体参与评估:不可能完成的任务?
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Aug;33(3):238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
7
Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams.患者作为响应性研究的合作伙伴:混合研究团队合作的方法学理念。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Mar;19(3):401-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732309331869.
8
Empowerment: a conceptual discussion.赋权:概念性探讨。
Health Care Anal. 2008 Jun;16(2):77-96. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0067-3. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
9
Patients as partners in a health research agenda setting: the feasibility of a participatory methodology.患者作为健康研究议程设定的合作伙伴:参与式方法的可行性
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Dec;29(4):424-39. doi: 10.1177/0163278706293406.
10
Partnering with patients--a concept ready for action.与患者合作——一个亟待付诸行动的理念。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Oct;56(2):133-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03993.x.