• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对不可预测之事——心理健康风险管理中的权力与知识话语

Managing the Unpredictable - Discourses of Power and Knowledge in Mental Health Risk Management.

作者信息

Bakke Marion C A, Fluttert Frans, Juritzen Truls I

机构信息

Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Molde University College, Molde, Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Inq. 2025 Jul;32(3):e70032. doi: 10.1111/nin.70032.

DOI:10.1111/nin.70032
PMID:40370261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12079309/
Abstract

In mental health, the safety and risk concept refers to a complex phenomenon with strong connections to risk management strategies, simultaneously influenced by the ideals of patient involvement and empowerment. The aim of this paper is to analyze discourses linked to patient involvement and the management of risk and safety, as articulated in the protocol for the Early Recognition Method (ERM) risk management strategy. As an analytical tool, we have drawn inspiration from the discourse theory of Michel Foucault and utilized Hall's six elements for discourse analysis. Our analysis indicates that the ERM protocol rests its discursive authority upon two main discourses: one, a scientific medical discourse and the other, a discourse strongly linked to empowerment and patient involvement. These two discourses are interrelated in a complex fluctuation of power dynamics in which they sometimes complement each other and, at other times, are in conflict. We claim that by applying a Foucauldian angle on discourse, power, and knowledge, our analysis may facilitate a critical awareness of the power dynamics inherent in risk management discourses and provide valuable insights into how articulations of safety and risk - combined with ideals of participation and empowerment - contribute to reframing practices in mental health care.

摘要

在心理健康领域,安全与风险概念指的是一种与风险管理策略紧密相连的复杂现象,同时受到患者参与和赋权理念的影响。本文旨在分析与患者参与以及风险和安全管理相关的话语,这些话语在早期识别方法(ERM)风险管理策略的协议中有所阐述。作为一种分析工具,我们从米歇尔·福柯的话语理论中汲取灵感,并运用霍尔的话语分析六要素。我们的分析表明,ERM协议的话语权威基于两种主要话语:一种是科学医学话语,另一种是与赋权和患者参与紧密相关 的话语。这两种话语在权力动态的复杂波动中相互关联,它们有时相互补充,有时相互冲突。我们认为,通过从福柯的角度审视话语、权力和知识,我们的分析可能有助于批判性地认识风险管理话语中固有的权力动态,并为安全与风险的表述如何与参与和赋权理念相结合从而有助于重塑精神卫生保健实践提供有价值的见解。

相似文献

1
Managing the Unpredictable - Discourses of Power and Knowledge in Mental Health Risk Management.应对不可预测之事——心理健康风险管理中的权力与知识话语
Nurs Inq. 2025 Jul;32(3):e70032. doi: 10.1111/nin.70032.
2
Patient participation as discursive practice-A critical discourse analysis of Danish mental healthcare.作为话语实践的患者参与——对丹麦精神卫生保健的批判性话语分析
Nurs Inq. 2018 Apr;25(2):e12218. doi: 10.1111/nin.12218. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
Mental health policy and mental health service user perspectives on involvement: a discourse analysis.心理健康政策与心理健康服务使用者对参与的看法:一项话语分析
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Aug;59(4):416-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04341.x.
4
Normalising disclosure or reinforcing heroism? An exploratory critical discourse analysis of mental health stigma in medical education.正常化披露还是强化英雄主义?医学教育中心理健康污名的探索性批评话语分析。
Med Educ. 2022 Aug;56(8):823-833. doi: 10.1111/medu.14790. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
5
"Whatever you hide, also hides you": A discourse analysis on mental health and service use in an American community of Somalis.“你所隐藏的,也会隐藏你”:对美国索马里社区心理健康和服务利用情况的话语分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114563. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114563. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
6
Patient empowerment and control: a psychological discourse in the service of medicine.患者赋权与控制权:服务于医学的一种心理学论述。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Nov;57(10):1969-80. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00063-7.
7
Dependence and resistance in community mental health care-Negotiations of user participation between staff and users.社区精神卫生保健中的依赖与抗拒——工作人员与服务对象之间关于服务对象参与的协商
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):600-609. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12407. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
8
'Constrained collaboration': Patient empowerment discourse as resource for countervailing power.“受限协作”:患者赋权话语作为抗衡力量的资源
Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Nov;38(8):1364-1378. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12480. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
9
How discourses of social vulnerability can influence nurse-patient interactions: A Foucauldian analysis.社会脆弱性话语如何影响护患互动:福柯分析。
Nurs Inq. 2019 Oct;26(4):e12309. doi: 10.1111/nin.12309. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Is perceived patient involvement in mental health care associated with satisfaction and empowerment?患者感知到的参与精神卫生保健与满意度和赋权有关吗?
Health Expect. 2015 Aug;18(4):516-26. doi: 10.1111/hex.12052. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Consumer involvement and guiding frameworks in mental healthcare: An integrative literature review.消费者参与和精神卫生保健指导框架:综合文献回顾。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Oct;33(5):1227-1241. doi: 10.1111/inm.13343. Epub 2024 May 5.
2
User violence prevention and intervention measures to minimize and prevent aggression towards health care workers: A systematic review.预防和干预针对医护人员暴力行为的措施,以尽量减少和防止对医护人员的攻击:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19495. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19495. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of Safewards and the alignment to the i-PARIHS framework - A qualitative systematic review.实施 Safewards 及与 i-PARIHS 框架对齐的障碍和促成因素 - 一项定性系统评价。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Feb;33(1):18-36. doi: 10.1111/inm.13222. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Mental Health Recovery in Social Psychiatric Policies: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.社会精神病学政策中的心理健康康复:反思性主题分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 9;20(12):6094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126094.
5
'They don't really know why they're here' mental health professionals' perspectives of consumer representatives.“他们并不真正清楚自己为何来到这里”:心理健康专业人员对消费者代表的看法
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Jun;32(3):819-828. doi: 10.1111/inm.13124. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
6
The European Standard EN 17398:2020 on Patient Involvement in Health Care - a Fairclough-Inspired Critical Discourse Analysis.《欧洲标准 EN 17398:2020 关于患者参与医疗保健 - 基于 Fairclough 理论的批判性话语分析》。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2022 May;23(2):130-141. doi: 10.1177/15271544221088250. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
Conflict management: A qualitative study of mental health staff's perceptions of factors that may influence conflicts with forensic mental health inpatients.冲突管理:一项关于心理健康工作人员对可能影响与法医精神病住院患者冲突的因素的看法的定性研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2021 Oct;35(5):407-417. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Part II: Living Life: A Meta-Synthesis Exploring Recovery as Processual Experiences.第二部分:生活:探索作为过程体验的康复的元综合。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 6;18(11):6115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116115.
9
The reasonable patient - A Swedish discursive construction.理性患者——一种瑞典式话语建构。
Nurs Inq. 2021 Jul;28(3):e12401. doi: 10.1111/nin.12401. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Violence and mental disorders: a structured review of associations by individual diagnoses, risk factors, and risk assessment.暴力与精神障碍:基于个体诊断、风险因素和风险评估的关联的结构化综述。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;8(2):150-161. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30262-5. Epub 2020 Oct 20.