Levine Phillip B
Department of Economics, Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.
J Health Econ. 2003 Sep;22(5):861-78. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00063-8.
This paper considers the impact of the introduction of laws requiring parental involvement in a minor's decision to abort a pregnancy. State-level data over the 1985-1996 period are used to examine abortion, birth, and pregnancy outcomes, while microdata from the 1988 and 1995 National Surveys of Family Growth (NSFG) are utilized to examine sexual activity and contraception. Quasi-experimental methods are employed that examine whether minors' fertility outcomes were affected in those locations that introduced these laws following their introduction and occurred for minors but not other women. I find that parental involvement laws resulted in fewer abortions for minors resulting from fewer pregnancies; there is no statistically significant impact on births. The reduction in pregnancy seems to be attributable to increased use of contraception rather than a reduction in sexual activity.
本文探讨了要求父母参与未成年人堕胎决定的法律实施所产生的影响。利用1985 - 1996年期间的州级数据来研究堕胎、生育和怀孕结果,同时使用1988年和1995年全国家庭成长调查(NSFG)的微观数据来研究性行为和避孕情况。采用准实验方法,考察在引入这些法律的地区,未成年人的生育结果是否受到影响,且这种影响是针对未成年人而非其他女性。我发现,父母参与法律导致未成年人怀孕减少,进而堕胎数量减少;对生育没有统计学上的显著影响。怀孕减少似乎归因于避孕措施使用增加,而非性行为减少。