• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母参与法对寻求堕胎服务的未成年人的影响:一项系统综述。

The impact of parental involvement laws on minors seeking abortion services: a systematic review.

作者信息

Kramer Alisha, Ti Angeline, Travis Lisa, Laboe Adrienne, Ochieng Walter O, Young Marisa R

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Family Medicine, Wellstar Hospital, Morrow, GA 30260, United States.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2023 Sep 18;1(4):qxad045. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad045. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxad045
PMID:38756747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10986272/
Abstract

On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in . Minors are a vulnerable population with a high risk of unintended pregnancy who are likely to be disproportionately affected by abortion restrictions. Examining the impact of historical abortion restrictions in minors may provide insight into the anticipated effects of the decision. This study is a systematic review examining the impact of parental involvement (PI) laws on minors seeking abortion services. Our review suggests an association between PI laws and decreased abortion rates. Parental involvement laws also may increase pregnancy and birth rates and out-of-state travel for abortion procedures and lead to later abortions, although effects appear to be heterogenous.

摘要

2022年6月24日,美国最高法院推翻了堕胎的宪法权利。未成年人是意外怀孕风险较高的弱势群体,很可能受到堕胎限制的影响尤为严重。研究历史上堕胎限制对未成年人的影响,或许能洞察这一裁决的预期效果。本研究是一项系统性综述,考察父母参与(PI)法对寻求堕胎服务的未成年人的影响。我们的综述表明,PI法与堕胎率下降之间存在关联。父母参与法还可能提高怀孕率和生育率,增加前往州外进行堕胎手术的人数,并导致堕胎时间推迟,尽管影响似乎存在异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d5/10986272/da83f074e2bb/qxad045f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d5/10986272/c810a55371d2/qxad045f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d5/10986272/da83f074e2bb/qxad045f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d5/10986272/c810a55371d2/qxad045f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d5/10986272/da83f074e2bb/qxad045f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of parental involvement laws on minors seeking abortion services: a systematic review.父母参与法对寻求堕胎服务的未成年人的影响:一项系统综述。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Sep 18;1(4):qxad045. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad045. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.州政府对堕胎的限制所产生的经济影响:父母同意和通知法以及医疗补助资金限制。
J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511.
3
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
4
Judicial bypass for minors post-.未成年人案件的司法豁免后置。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231219601. doi: 10.1177/17455057231219601.
5
The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.美国影响堕胎的法律及其对女性健康的影响。
Nurse Pract. 1991 Dec;16(12):53-9. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199112000-00013.
6
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.罗诉韦德案之后,凯西案之后:一项“基本”权利的现状与未来。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.
7
Legislation on contraception and abortion for adolescents.关于青少年避孕与堕胎的立法。
Stud Fam Plann. 1985 Sep-Oct;16(5):241-51.
8
Mandatory parental involvement in minors' abortions: effects of the laws in Minnesota, Missouri, and Indiana.强制父母参与未成年人堕胎:明尼苏达州、密苏里州和印第安纳州法律的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Aug;87(8):1367-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.8.1367.
9
Did parental involvement laws grow teeth? The effects of state restrictions on minors' access to abortion.父母参与法是否有了效力?州对未成年人堕胎限制的影响。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102302. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102302. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.美国多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后的堕胎设施出行时间估计和空间可达性。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2041-2047. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20424.

引用本文的文献

1
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.《2022 年美国堕胎监测报告》
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024 Nov 28;73(7):1-28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7307a1.

本文引用的文献

1
A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States.一项在美国寻求医疗机构服务的人群中考察自行人工流产意向的横断面研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 12;19(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01486-8.
2
Why restricting access to abortion damages women's health.为什么限制堕胎会损害妇女的健康。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jul 26;19(7):e1004075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004075. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Characteristics and birth outcomes of pregnant adolescents compared to older women: An analysis of individual level data from 140,000 mothers from 20 RCTs.
与年长女性相比,怀孕青少年的特征及分娩结局:对来自20项随机对照试验的140,000名母亲的个体水平数据的分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Feb 26;45:101309. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101309. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Assessment of Incidence and Factors Associated With Severe Maternal Morbidity After Delivery Discharge Among Women in the US.美国产妇产后出院后严重产妇发病率及相关因素评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036148. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36148.
5
Prevalence of Self-Managed Abortion Among Women of Reproductive Age in the United States.美国育龄妇女中自我管理堕胎的流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029245. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29245.
6
Did parental involvement laws grow teeth? The effects of state restrictions on minors' access to abortion.父母参与法是否有了效力?州对未成年人堕胎限制的影响。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102302. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102302. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
The Impact of Parental Involvement Laws on the Abortion Rate of Minors.父母参与法对未成年人堕胎率的影响。
Demography. 2020 Feb;57(1):323-346. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00853-8.
8
The Impact of a Parental Notification Requirement on Illinois Minors' Access to and Decision-Making Around Abortion.父母通知要求对伊利诺伊州未成年人获得和决定堕胎的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;62(3):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
9
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
10
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年美国意外怀孕率下降情况
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.