社会资本与建成环境：适宜步行社区的重要性。
Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods.
作者信息
Leyden Kevin M
机构信息
Department of Political Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6317, USA.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1546-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1546.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
I sought to examine whether pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use neighborhoods encourage enhanced levels of social and community engagement (i.e., social capital).
METHODS
The study investigated the relationship between neighborhood design and individual levels of social capital. Data were obtained from a household survey that measured the social capital of citizens living in neighborhoods that ranged from traditional, mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented designs to modern, car-dependent suburban subdivisions in Galway, Ireland.
RESULTS
The analyses indicate that persons living in walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods have higher levels of social capital compared with those living in car-oriented suburbs. Respondents living in walkable neighborhoods were more likely to know their neighbors, participate politically, trust others, and be socially engaged.
CONCLUSIONS
Walkable, mixed-use neighborhood designs can encourage the development of social capital.
摘要
目的
我试图研究以行人为导向的混合用途社区是否能促进更高水平的社会和社区参与度（即社会资本）。
方法
该研究调查了社区设计与个人社会资本水平之间的关系。数据来自一项家庭调查，该调查测量了居住在爱尔兰戈尔韦从传统的、混合用途的、以行人为导向的设计到现代的、依赖汽车的郊区细分区域的社区居民的社会资本。
结果
分析表明，与居住在以汽车为导向的郊区的人相比，居住在适宜步行的混合用途社区的人具有更高水平的社会资本。居住在适宜步行社区的受访者更有可能认识他们的邻居、参与政治、信任他人并积极参与社交活动。
结论
适宜步行的混合用途社区设计可以促进社会资本的发展。
相似文献
1
Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods.社会资本与建成环境：适宜步行社区的重要性。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1546-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1546.
2
Construct validity of the physical activity neighborhood environment scale-Oman.阿曼体力活动邻里环境量表的构建效度。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;11:1007075. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1007075. eCollection 2023.
3
Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design.社区感及其与步行和邻里设计的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1381-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
4
Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity?迈向因果关系：建筑环境、邻里环境及出行偏好能否解释身体活动、驾驶行为和肥胖问题？
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1898-914. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.053. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
5
A systematic review of built environment and health.系统综述：建筑环境与健康。
Fam Community Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):68-78. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3181c4e2e5.
6
Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation.基于社区的身体活动差异：一项环境量表评估
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1552-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1552.
7
Walk Score, Transportation Mode Choice, and Walking Among French Adults: A GPS, Accelerometer, and Mobility Survey Study.步行评分、交通方式选择与法国成年人的步行情况：一项基于全球定位系统、加速计和出行调查的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 20;13(6):611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13060611.
8
Association of Neighborhood Walkability With Change in Overweight, Obesity, and Diabetes.社区可步行性与超重、肥胖和糖尿病变化的关联。
JAMA. 2016;315(20):2211-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5898.
9
What constitutes a health-enabling neighborhood? A grounded theory situational analysis addressing the significance of social capital and gender.什么样的社区才算有利于健康？通过扎根理论情境分析来探讨社会资本和性别因素的重要性。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:112-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
10
Designing healthy communities: creating evidence on metrics for built environment features associated with walkable neighbourhood activity centres.设计健康社区：生成关于与适宜步行的邻里活动中心相关的建筑环境特征指标的证据。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Dec 4;14(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0621-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Hundreds of grocery outlets needed across the United States to achieve walkable cities.在美国，要打造适宜步行的城市需要数百个杂货店网点。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):6051. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61454-1.
2
Relationships between community public service facilities and social capital: An exploratory study of Harbin, China.社区公共服务设施与社会资本之间的关系：对中国哈尔滨的一项探索性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0318144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318144. eCollection 2025.
3
Perceived urban environment elements associated with momentary and long-term well-being: An experience sampling method approach.与瞬间和长期幸福感相关的城市环境感知要素：一种经验取样法研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 5;15(1):4422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88349-x.
4
Deep Learning Analysis of Google Street View to Assess Residential Built Environment and Cardiovascular Risk in a U.S. Midwestern Retrospective Cohort.利用谷歌街景进行深度学习分析，以评估美国中西部回顾性队列中的居住建筑环境与心血管风险
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Feb 4. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf038.
5
Reducing the social inequity of neighborhood visual environment in Los Angeles through computer vision and multi-model machine learning.通过计算机视觉和多模型机器学习减少洛杉矶邻里视觉环境的社会不平等。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2025 Feb;119. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.106062. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
6
Using Video Cameras to Assess Physical Activity and Other Well-Being Behaviors in Urban Environments: Feasibility, Reliability, and Participant Reactivity Studies.使用摄像机评估城市环境中的身体活动及其他健康行为：可行性、可靠性和参与者反应性研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Dec 16;10:e66049. doi: 10.2196/66049.
7
(Dis)connected by design? Using participatory citizen science to uncover environmental determinants of social connectedness for youth in under-resourced neighbourhoods.(设计上的)脱节？利用参与式公民科学揭示资源匮乏社区青年社会联系的环境决定因素。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):3104. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20597-4.
8
Exploring the group heterogeneity in the impact of social cohesion on the walking frequency of older adults in China.探究社会凝聚力对中国老年人步行频率影响的群体异质性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1424975. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1424975. eCollection 2024.
9
The Dynamic Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space in Diverse Communities: Opportunities and Challenges to Public Health.多元社区中社会凝聚力与城市绿地之间的动态关系：对公共健康的机遇与挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 19;21(6):800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060800.
10
Addressing loneliness and social isolation in 52 countries: a scoping review of National policies.解决 52 个国家的孤独和社会隔离问题：国家政策的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 1;24(1):1207. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18370-8.
本文引用的文献
1
Urban sprawl and public health.城市扩张与公共健康。
Public Health Rep. 2002 May-Jun;117(3):201-17. doi: 10.1093/phr/117.3.201.
2
Walking and leisure-time activity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women.绝经后女性的步行及休闲活动与髋部骨折风险
JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2300-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2300.
3
Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins.运动的量和强度对血浆脂蛋白的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 7;347(19):1483-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020194.
4
Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999-2000.1999 - 2000年美国儿童及青少年超重的患病率及趋势
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1728-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1728.
5
Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000.1999 - 2000年美国成年人肥胖症的患病率及趋势
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1723-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723.
6
7
Walking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women.步行与剧烈运动对预防女性心血管事件的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 5;347(10):716-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021067.
8
Cholesterol reduction and increased cardiovascular fitness following a 12 weeks brisk walking.12周轻快步行后胆固醇降低及心血管健康改善
J Nutr Health Aging. 2002;6(2):138-40.
9
Social ties and mental health.社会关系与心理健康。
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):458-67. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.458.
10
The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States.美国持续蔓延的肥胖症和糖尿病流行病。
JAMA. 2001 Sep 12;286(10):1195-200. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.10.1195.
Zotero 插件