• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法医学会议审计

An audit of medicolegal conferencing.

作者信息

Pringle R G

机构信息

Burnell House, 82 Berwick Road, Shrewsbury SY1 2NF, UK.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 2003 Sep;96(9):454-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680309600910.

DOI:10.1177/014107680309600910
PMID:12949203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC539602/
Abstract

In the English civil justice system, experts involved in a case are now commonly required to confer before the hearing and identify the areas of agreement and disagreement. A prospective study of 50 consecutive medicolegal conferences of experts was undertaken, with a view to defining their benefits, weaknesses and the optimum conference format. A record was kept of the dates of first instruction, court deadlines, and date, time and duration of conferences, together with related calls and correspondence. The manner of preparation of the statement was noted, the level of agreement/disagreement, any compromise, any later modifications of the draft, and the author's fees. Subsequently the instructing solicitors were asked to comment on the suitability of the joint statement and its contribution to settlement. Medicolegal conferencing is time-consuming and expensive. It may be of limited value where there is little or no difference of opinion, either between experts in a single field or between experts in different fields. The instructing solicitors must ensure that the participants receive, in advance of the conference, copies of all relevant documents including medical reports and medical records. An agenda is helpful in ensuring that matters of importance are not overlooked. Conferences are more effective when held in person than when conducted by telephone. The joint statement is best dictated in the presence of all participants during or after the conference. To ensure the most efficient and economical use of consultant time a formal combined audit of conferencing should be undertaken by the medical and legal professions.

摘要

在英国民事司法系统中,如今通常要求参与案件的专家在听证会前进行协商,确定达成一致和存在分歧的领域。对连续50次专家法医学会议进行了一项前瞻性研究,旨在明确其益处、缺点及最佳会议形式。记录了首次受委托日期、法庭期限、会议日期、时间和时长,以及相关的电话和通信情况。记录了陈述的准备方式、一致/分歧程度、任何妥协、草案随后的修改情况以及作者费用。随后,要求委托律师对联合声明的适用性及其对和解的贡献发表评论。法医学会议既耗时又昂贵。在单一领域的专家之间或不同领域的专家之间意见很少或没有分歧的情况下,其价值可能有限。委托律师必须确保参会人员在会议前收到所有相关文件的副本,包括医学报告和病历。议程有助于确保重要事项不被忽视。会议亲自举行比通过电话进行更有效。联合声明最好在会议期间或会议结束后所有参会人员在场时进行口述。为确保最有效地利用顾问时间,医学和法律专业应进行正式的联合会议审计。

相似文献

1
An audit of medicolegal conferencing.法医学会议审计
J R Soc Med. 2003 Sep;96(9):454-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680309600910.
2
Clinical conferences for physicians: Who sets the agenda?面向医生的临床研讨会:议程由谁设定?
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S91-2. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150703.
3
Medicolegal issues for the respiratory paediatrician.儿科呼吸科医生面临的法医学问题。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2022 Mar;41:3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Orthopaedic expert opinion, testimony, and the physician as a defendant.骨科专家意见、证词以及作为被告的医生。
Instr Course Lect. 2011;60:597-605.
5
[Experience in conducting working conferences for forensic medical experts in studying material evidence].[法医专家研究物证工作会议的开展经验]
Sud Med Ekspert. 1984 Jan-Mar;27(1):51-2.
6
Conclaves and concurrent expert evidence: a positive development in Australian legal practice?秘密会议与同时期专家证据:澳大利亚法律实务中的积极发展?
Med J Aust. 2016 Feb 1;204(2):82-3. doi: 10.5694/mja15.00759.
7
E-conferencing for delivery of residency didactics.用于住院医师教学的电子会议。
Acad Med. 2002 Jul;77(7):748-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00038.
8
[What makes a good expert opinion in orthopedics and trauma surgery? : Expectations on the experts].[骨科与创伤外科领域怎样才算得上是一份优秀的专家意见?:对专家的期望]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 May;126(5):348-350. doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01255-z. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
9
[What makes a good expert opinion in orthopedics and trauma surgery? : Expectations on the experts].[骨科与创伤外科领域的优秀专家意见是什么?:对专家的期望]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Jun;52(6):492-494. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04398-y. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation.在残疾评估的法医学领域促进道德和客观的实践。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2001 Aug;12(3):571-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicolegal conferencing.法医学会议。
J R Soc Med. 2003 Nov;96(11):573-4. doi: 10.1177/014107680309601132.

本文引用的文献

1
Expert witnesses, courts and the law.专家证人、法庭与法律。
J R Soc Med. 2002 Sep;95(9):431-4. doi: 10.1177/014107680209500902.