Hodgev V, Kostianev S, Marinov B
Pulmonology Clinic and Pathophysiology Department, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2003 Sep;23(5):269-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-097x.2003.00506.x.
University of Cincinnati Dyspnea Questionnaire (UCDQ) was developed to measure the impact of dyspnoea during (1) physical activity (Phys), (2) speech activity (Speech) and (3) simultaneous speech and physical activity (Comb). The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of UCDQ in COPD patients, comparing it to a large set of dyspnoeic indices and functional parameters. Fifty COPD patients (age 58.7 +/- 9.1 years, FEV1%pred = 39.3 +/- 17.0%, Baseline Dyspnoea Index (BDI) = 4.9 +/- 2.5, Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) = 373 +/- 128 m, Symptoms score = 9.4 +/- 2.5; mean +/- SD) participated in the study. We found the following mean scores for the three sections of the questionnaire: Phys = 3.5 +/- 0.9; Speech = 2.4 +/- 1.1; Comb = 4.2 +/- 1.0, meaning that patients report the most breathlessness during the combination of speaking and physical activity and the least breathlessness during speech activities. All three section of UCDQ had significant strong correlation with dyspnoea indices (BDI, Borg, MRC, OCD), 6MWD and symptoms score, which proves its concurrent and construct validity. Differentiation of patients by speech section (=3<) discriminated them significantly with respect to all dyspnoeic indices, symptoms score and 6MWD. All three dimensions of UCDQ had high test-retest reliability - ICC between 0.76 and 0.93. Factor analysis yielded three interpretable factors, as all dyspnoeic indices, three sections of UCDQ, symptoms score and 6MWD were loaded on the first factor. In conclusion, UCDQ provides valid and reliable information about the effect of dyspnoea on speech and daily activities.
辛辛那提大学呼吸困难问卷(UCDQ)旨在衡量呼吸困难在(1)体力活动(Phys)、(2)言语活动(Speech)和(3)言语与体力活动同时进行(Comb)期间的影响。本研究的目的是评估UCDQ在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的有效性,并将其与大量呼吸困难指标和功能参数进行比较。五十名COPD患者(年龄58.7±9.1岁,预测第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1%pred)=39.3±17.0%,基线呼吸困难指数(BDI)=4.9±2.5,六分钟步行距离(6MWD)=373±128米,症状评分=9.4±2.5;均值±标准差)参与了该研究。我们发现问卷三个部分的以下平均得分:Phys = 3.5±0.9;Speech = 2.4±1.1;Comb = 4.2±1.0,这意味着患者在言语和体力活动同时进行时报告的呼吸困难最严重,而在言语活动期间报告的呼吸困难最轻。UCDQ的所有三个部分与呼吸困难指标(BDI、Borg、MRC、OCD)、6MWD和症状评分均具有显著的强相关性,这证明了其同时效度和结构效度。根据言语部分(=3<)对患者进行区分,在所有呼吸困难指标、症状评分和6MWD方面对他们进行了显著区分。UCDQ的所有三个维度都具有较高的重测信度——组内相关系数(ICC)在0.76至0.93之间。因子分析产生了三个可解释的因子,因为所有呼吸困难指标、UCDQ的三个部分、症状评分和6MWD都加载在第一个因子上。总之,UCDQ提供了关于呼吸困难对言语和日常活动影响的有效且可靠的信息。