Beattie P E, Lewis-Jones M S
Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003 Sep;28(5):549-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2003.01357.x.
Poor adherence with therapy is a major cause of treatment failure in atopic dermatitis. Reasons given are multifactorial, and include fear of real or imaginary side-effects, under-prescribing, failure to renew prescriptions on time, lack of time, and child refusal of therapy. Most important, however, is lack of knowledge about treatment, in particular the use of topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy. We conducted a questionnaire-based study to determine the level of use and knowledge of commonly prescribed TCS preparations amongst parents or carers of 100 children attending paediatric outpatient clinics. Weakly potent TCSs were the most commonly used (86%), but poorly understood. Only 35 (41%) who had used hydrocortisone were aware that it was weakly potent, and 44% graded it as moderately potent. Of 65 who had used the moderately potent TCS clobetasone butyrate 0.05% (Eumovate); Glaxo Wellcome, Uxbridge, UK), 19 (29%) graded it as potent and eight (12%) as weak. Of 50 who had used betamethasone valerate 0.1% (Betnovate); Glaxo Wellcome, Uxbridge, UK), 42% did not grade it as potent. Understanding of TCS/antimicrobial combinations was generally worse. The hydrocortisone 1%/fusidic acid 2% combination (Fucidin H(R); Leo, Risborough, Bucks, UK) was graded as moderate or strong by 88% of the 74 who had used it. Over half (53%) of the 34 using the combination of clobetasone butyrate 0.05%/nystatin 100000 i.u./g tetracycline 3% (Trimovate); Glaxo Wellcome, Uxbridge, UK) assumed that it was a potent TCS. Forty-nine had used Fucibet (betamethasone valerate 0.1%, fusidic acid 2%; Leo, Risborough, Bucks, UK) but 34.5% did not grade it as potent. There was poor knowledge of the strengths of some of the most commonly used TCSs, and all steroid/antimicrobial combinations were perceived as being of greater potency than the constituent steroid alone. Fusidic acid was thought to be a steroid by almost half (46.9%) of the respondents. The packaging of the different products by some pharmaceutical companies is remarkably similar and labelling contains information on the compound and percentage rather than potency of the TCS. This may be a source of confusion. We recommend that manufacturers clearly label TCS products by potency as mild, moderate, potent or very potent and that packaging is sufficiently different for each strength of TCS or emollient to avoid confusion. In order to achieve optimal topical treatment for atopic dermatitis, patients and their carers must receive adequate information and training in how and when to use topical therapies in conjunction with written care plans.
治疗依从性差是特应性皮炎治疗失败的主要原因。给出的原因是多方面的,包括对真实或想象中的副作用的恐惧、处方不足、未按时续订处方、时间不足以及儿童拒绝治疗。然而,最重要的是对治疗缺乏了解,尤其是外用糖皮质激素(TCS)疗法的使用。我们进行了一项基于问卷调查的研究,以确定100名儿科门诊患儿的家长或照顾者对常用TCS制剂的使用水平和了解程度。弱效TCS是最常用的(86%),但了解程度较差。在使用氢化可的松的35人(41%)中,只有14人(41%)知道它是弱效的,44%将其评为中效。在使用中效TCS丁酸氯倍他松0.05%(尤卓尔;葛兰素威康公司,英国乌克斯布里奇)的65人中,19人(29%)将其评为强效,8人(12%)评为弱效。在使用戊酸倍他米松0.1%(倍他米松;葛兰素威康公司,英国乌克斯布里奇)的50人中,42%没有将其评为强效。对TCS/抗菌药物组合的了解通常更差。在使用1%氢化可的松/2%夫西地酸组合(复可托;利奥制药公司,英国白金汉郡里斯伯勒)的74人中,88%将其评为中效或强效。在使用0.05%丁酸氯倍他松/100000单位制霉菌素/3%四环素组合(特美肤;葛兰素威康公司,英国乌克斯布里奇)的34人中,超过一半(53%)认为它是一种强效TCS。49人使用过肤轻松(0.1%戊酸倍他米松,2%夫西地酸;利奥制药公司,英国白金汉郡里斯伯勒),但34.5%没有将其评为强效。对一些最常用TCS的强度了解不足,所有类固醇/抗菌药物组合都被认为比单独的成分类固醇效力更强。近一半(46.9%)的受访者认为夫西地酸是一种类固醇。一些制药公司不同产品的包装非常相似,标签包含化合物和百分比信息,而不是TCS的效力信息。这可能是造成混淆的一个原因。我们建议制造商按效力将TCS产品明确标注为轻度、中度、强效或超强效,并且每种强度的TCS或润肤剂的包装要有足够的差异以避免混淆。为了实现特应性皮炎的最佳局部治疗,患者及其照顾者必须获得关于如何以及何时使用局部疗法的充分信息和培训,并结合书面护理计划。