Suppr超能文献

苏格兰急诊科的儿科插管操作

Paediatric intubation in Scottish emergency departments.

作者信息

Oglesby A J, Graham C A, Beard D, McKeown D W

机构信息

Specialist Registrar in Accident and Emergency Medicine Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Lauriston Place Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2003 Sep;13(7):589-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01107.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intubation of children in the emergency department setting is uncommon. This prospective observational study examines the practice of paediatric intubation in Scottish adult/paediatric urban emergency departments.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of every intubation attempt was performed in seven urban Scottish emergency departments in 1999 and 2000. Children were defined as those patients who were less than 13 years of age on the day of presentation. Prehospital intubations were only included if they were performed by a mobile medical team doctor from one of the seven hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 1713 patients were identified, 44 of whom (2.6%) were children. The median age was 4 years (range 0-12 years), and 57% (25 of 44) of intubations were performed on patients with traumatic injuries. Emergency physicians attempted intubation in 27% (12 of 44) of cases, anaesthetists in 73% (32 of 44); 18% (eight of 44) of patients were intubated in nontraumatic cardiac arrest, 68% (30 of 44) underwent rapid sequence intubation (RSI), one (2%) had inhalational anaesthesia and 13 (30%) were intubated without drugs. Eighty per cent (35 of 44) of patients were intubated at the first attempt; eight patients required two attempts, and one required three attempts. Three children were intubated prehospital by mobile medical teams. Emergency physicians intubated more patients with 'physiological compromise' (100% vs 91%).

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric intubation in the emergency department is uncommon. Collaboration and appropriate training for doctors in emergency medicine, anaesthesia and paediatrics is essential.

摘要

背景

在急诊科对儿童进行插管并不常见。这项前瞻性观察性研究调查了苏格兰城市地区成人/儿科急诊科的儿科插管实践情况。

方法

1999年和2000年,在苏格兰的7个城市急诊科对每一次插管尝试进行了前瞻性观察性研究。儿童定义为就诊当天年龄小于13岁的患者。仅当由七家医院之一的移动医疗队医生进行院外插管时才纳入研究。

结果

共识别出1713例患者,其中44例(2.6%)为儿童。中位年龄为4岁(范围0 - 12岁),57%(44例中的25例)的插管是针对创伤性损伤患者进行的。27%(44例中的12例)的病例由急诊医生尝试插管,73%(44例中的32例)由麻醉医生进行;18%(44例中的8例)的患者在非创伤性心脏骤停时进行插管,68%(44例中的30例)接受快速顺序诱导插管(RSI),1例(2%)采用吸入麻醉,13例(30%)在无药物的情况下进行插管。80%(44例中的35例)的患者首次尝试即成功插管;8例患者需要两次尝试,1例需要三次尝试。3名儿童由移动医疗队在院外进行插管。急诊医生插管的“生理功能受损”患者更多(100%对91%)。

结论

急诊科的儿科插管并不常见。急诊医学、麻醉学和儿科学医生之间的协作及适当培训至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验