Stevenson A G M, Graham C A, Hall R, Korsah P, McGuffie A C
Department of Emergency Medicine, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock KA2 0BE, UK.
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun;24(6):394-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.041988.
Tracheal intubation is the accepted gold standard for emergency department (ED) airway management. It may be performed by both anaesthetists and emergency physicians (EPs), with or without drugs.
To characterise intubation practice in a busy district general hospital ED in Scotland over 40 months between 2003 and 2006.
Crosshouse Hospital, a 450-bed district general hospital serving a mixed urban and rural population; annual ED census 58,000 patients.
Prospective observational study using data collection sheets prepared by the Scottish Trauma Audit Group. Proformas were completed at the time of intubation and checked by investigators. Rapid-sequence induction (RSI) was defined as the co-administration of an induction agent and suxamethonium.
234 intubations over 40 months, with a mean of 6 per month. EPs attempted 108 intubations (46%). Six patients in cardiac arrest on arrival were intubated without drugs. 29 patients were intubated after a gas induction or non-RSI drug administration. RSI was performed on 199 patients. Patients with trauma constituted 75 (38%) of the RSI group. 29 RSIs (15%) were immediate (required on arrival at the ED) and 154 (77%) were urgent (required within 30 min of arrival at the ED). EPs attempted RSI in 88 (44%) patients and successfully intubated 85 (97%). Anaesthetists attempted RSI in 111 (56%) patients and successfully intubated 108 (97%). Anaesthetists had a higher proportion of good views at first laryngoscopy and there was a trend to a higher rate of successful intubation at the first attempt for anaesthetists. Complication rates were comparable for the two specialties.
Tracheal intubations using RSI in the ED are performed by EPs almost as often as by anaesthetists in this district hospital. Overall success and complication rates are comparable for the two specialties. Laryngoscopy training and the need to achieve intubation at the first (optimum) attempt needs to be emphasised in EP airway training.
气管插管是急诊科气道管理公认的金标准。麻醉医生和急诊医生均可实施,可使用或不使用药物。
描述2003年至2006年期间苏格兰一家繁忙的区级综合医院急诊科40个月内的插管情况。
克罗斯豪斯医院,一家拥有450张床位的区级综合医院,服务于城乡混合人口;急诊科年接诊量为58000例患者。
采用苏格兰创伤审计小组编制的数据收集表进行前瞻性观察研究。在插管时填写表格,并由研究人员检查。快速顺序诱导(RSI)定义为同时使用诱导剂和琥珀酰胆碱。
40个月内共进行了234次插管,平均每月6次。急诊医生尝试插管108次(46%)。6例心脏骤停患者到达时未使用药物即进行了插管。29例患者在气体诱导或非RSI药物给药后进行了插管。199例患者进行了RSI。创伤患者占RSI组的75例(38%)。29次RSI(15%)为即刻插管(到达急诊科时需要),154次(77%)为紧急插管(到达急诊科后30分钟内需要)。急诊医生对88例(44%)患者尝试进行RSI,成功插管85例(97%)。麻醉医生对111例(56%)患者尝试进行RSI,成功插管108例(97%)。麻醉医生首次喉镜检查时视野良好的比例更高,且麻醉医生首次尝试成功插管的比例有更高的趋势。两个专业的并发症发生率相当。
在这家区级医院,急诊科使用RSI进行气管插管时,急诊医生的操作频率几乎与麻醉医生相同。两个专业的总体成功率和并发症发生率相当。在急诊医生气道培训中,需要强调喉镜检查培训以及首次(最佳)尝试时成功插管的必要性。