Love Bradley C, Markman Arthur B
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):790-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196117.
Typically, models of category learning are verified through behavioral experiments with stimuli consisting of putatively independent dimensions such as shape, size, and color. The assumption of independence is critical in both the design of behavioral experiments and the development of models and theories of learning. Using the standard classification learning paradigm and a common stimulus set, the present work demonstrates that the assumption of independence is unwarranted. Systematic relations span stimulus dimensions and govern learning performance. For example, shape is not independent of size and color, because humans quantify size and color over shape when shape is relevant to the categorization. This quantification is reflected in natural language use (e.g., "blue triangle" as opposed to "triangle and blue"). In this example, color and size are predicates and shape is the argument. Across four experiments, the difficulty of mastering a classification rule can be predicted by the number of predicates that must be unbound in order to free rule-relevant stimulus dimensions.
通常,类别学习模型是通过行为实验来验证的,实验中的刺激由假定独立的维度组成,如形状、大小和颜色。独立性假设在行为实验设计以及学习模型和理论的发展中都至关重要。利用标准分类学习范式和常见刺激集,本研究表明独立性假设是没有根据的。系统关系跨越刺激维度并支配学习表现。例如,形状并非独立于大小和颜色,因为当形状与分类相关时,人类会在形状上对大小和颜色进行量化。这种量化反映在自然语言使用中(例如,“蓝色三角形”而非“三角形和蓝色”)。在这个例子中,颜色和大小是谓词,形状是主词。在四项实验中,掌握分类规则的难度可以通过为释放与规则相关的刺激维度而必须解除绑定的谓词数量来预测。