Henderson John M, Williams Carrick C, Castelhano Monica S, Falk Richard J
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1117, USA.
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jul;65(5):725-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03194809.
Eye movements were monitored during a recognition memory test of previously studied pictures of full-color scenes. The test scenes were identical to the originals, had an object deleted from them, or included a new object substituted for an original object. In contrast to a prior report (Parker, 1978), we found no evidence that object deletions or substitutions could be recognized on the basis of information acquired from the visual periphery. Deletions were difficult to recognize peripherally, and the eyes were not attracted to them. Overall, the amplitude of the average saccade to the critical object during the memory test was less than 4.5 degrees of visual angle in all conditions and averaged 4.1 degrees across conditions. We conclude that information about object presence and identity in a scene is limited to a relatively small region around the current fixation point.
在对之前研究过的全彩色场景图片进行再认记忆测试期间,对眼动进行了监测。测试场景与原始场景相同、从中删除了一个物体,或者包含一个替代原始物体的新物体。与之前的一份报告(帕克,1978年)相反,我们没有发现证据表明可以根据从视觉外周获得的信息识别物体的删除或替换。外周很难识别删除的物体,而且眼睛也不会被它们吸引。总体而言,在所有条件下,记忆测试期间对关键物体的平均扫视幅度小于4.5视角度,各条件下平均为4.1度。我们得出结论,关于场景中物体存在和身份的信息仅限于当前注视点周围相对较小的区域。