• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体间在视觉显著性上的差异会沿着语义维度发生变化。

Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Justus Liebig Universität, 35394 Giessen, Germany;

Experimental Psychology, University College London, WC1H 0AP London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11687-11692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820553116. Epub 2019 May 28.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1820553116
PMID:31138705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6576124/
Abstract

What determines where we look? Theories of attentional guidance hold that image features and task demands govern fixation behavior, while differences between observers are interpreted as a "noise-ceiling" that strictly limits predictability of fixations. However, recent twin studies suggest a genetic basis of gaze-trace similarity for a given stimulus. This leads to the question of how individuals differ in their gaze behavior and what may explain these differences. Here, we investigated the fixations of >100 human adults freely viewing a large set of complex scenes containing thousands of semantically annotated objects. We found systematic individual differences in fixation frequencies along six semantic stimulus dimensions. These differences were large (>twofold) and highly stable across images and time. Surprisingly, they also held for first fixations directed toward each image, commonly interpreted as "bottom-up" visual salience. Their perceptual relevance was documented by a correlation between individual face salience and face recognition skills. The set of reliable individual salience dimensions and their covariance pattern replicated across samples from three different countries, suggesting they reflect fundamental biological mechanisms of attention. Our findings show stable individual differences in salience along a set of fundamental semantic dimensions and that these differences have meaningful perceptual implications. Visual salience reflects features of the observer as well as the image.

摘要

是什么决定了我们的目光投向何处?注意引导理论认为,图像特征和任务需求决定了注视行为,而观察者之间的差异则被解释为一种“噪声上限”,严格限制了注视点的可预测性。然而,最近的双胞胎研究表明,对于给定的刺激,眼球追踪的相似性存在遗传基础。这就引出了一个问题,即个体在注视行为上有何差异,以及这些差异可能是由什么造成的。在这里,我们调查了 100 多名成年人在自由观看包含数千个语义注释对象的大量复杂场景时的注视点。我们发现,在六个语义刺激维度上,注视点的频率存在系统性的个体差异。这些差异很大(超过两倍),并且在图像和时间上都非常稳定。令人惊讶的是,它们也适用于指向每张图像的首次注视,通常被解释为“自下而上”的视觉显著性。个体面部显著性与面部识别能力之间的相关性证明了它们的感知相关性。这组可靠的个体显著性维度及其协方差模式在来自三个不同国家的样本中都得到了复制,这表明它们反映了注意力的基本生物机制。我们的研究结果表明,在一系列基本语义维度上,显著性存在稳定的个体差异,而且这些差异具有有意义的感知意义。视觉显著性反映了观察者和图像的特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/25842b79adc2/pnas.1820553116fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/befd180a43f9/pnas.1820553116fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/212ff352f615/pnas.1820553116fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/e7da0a411a07/pnas.1820553116fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/25842b79adc2/pnas.1820553116fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/befd180a43f9/pnas.1820553116fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/212ff352f615/pnas.1820553116fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/e7da0a411a07/pnas.1820553116fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d995/6576124/25842b79adc2/pnas.1820553116fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions.个体间在视觉显著性上的差异会沿着语义维度发生变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11687-11692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820553116. Epub 2019 May 28.
2
Quantifying task-related gaze.量化与任务相关的注视。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1318-1329. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02883-w. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
3
Meaning guides attention during scene viewing, even when it is irrelevant.意义在场景观看过程中引导注意力,即使它并不相关。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):20-34. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1607-7.
4
Complementary effects of gaze direction and early saliency in guiding fixations during free viewing.自由观看过程中注视方向和早期显著性在引导注视方面的互补作用。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 4;14(13):3. doi: 10.1167/14.13.3.
5
OSIEshort: A small stimulus set can reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience.OSIEshort:一个小的刺激集可以可靠地估计语义显著性的个体差异。
J Vis. 2020 Sep 2;20(9):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.9.13.
6
Meaning guides attention in real-world scene images: Evidence from eye movements and meaning maps.意义在真实场景图像中引导注意力:来自眼动和意义地图的证据。
J Vis. 2018 Jun 1;18(6):10. doi: 10.1167/18.6.10.
7
Overt attention in natural scenes: objects dominate features.自然场景中的显性注意力:物体主导特征。
Vision Res. 2015 Feb;107:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.场景要点及物体间空间依存关系在现实场景中注意力语义引导方面的作用。
Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
9
Attention in natural scenes: contrast affects rapid visual processing and fixations alike.注意自然场景:对比度对快速视觉处理和注视的影响是一样的。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 9;368(1628):20130067. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0067. Print 2013 Oct 19.
10
Attention in natural scenes: Affective-motivational factors guide gaze independently of visual salience.自然场景中的注意力:情感动机因素独立于视觉显著性引导注视。
Vision Res. 2017 Apr;133:161-175. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
When is enough enough? Empirical guidelines to determine participant sample size for scene viewing studies.何时才足够?确定场景观看研究参与者样本量的实证指南。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 28;57(9):241. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02754-8.
2
Distinct contributions of foveal and extrafoveal visual information to emotion judgments and gaze behavior for faces.中央凹和中央凹外视觉信息对人脸情绪判断和注视行为的不同贡献。
J Vis. 2025 Jul 1;25(8):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.8.4.
3
Protracted development of gaze behaviour.注视行为的长期发展。

本文引用的文献

1
Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps.语义地图揭示的场景中基于意义的注意力引导
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;1(10):743-747. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0208-0. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
A behavioral face preference deficit in a monkey with an incomplete face patch system.猴子面部补丁系统不完整导致的行为面部偏好缺陷。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:415-424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.043. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
3
Personalized Saliency and Its Prediction.个性化显著性及其预测。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02191-9.
4
Approaches to understanding natural behavior.理解自然行为的方法。
J Vis. 2025 May 1;25(6):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.6.12.
5
No robust evidence for an effect of head-movement propensity on central bias in head-constrained scene viewing, despite an effect on fixation duration.尽管头部运动倾向对注视持续时间有影响,但在头部受限的场景观看中,没有确凿证据表明其对中央偏差有影响。
J Vis. 2025 Apr 1;25(4):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.4.10.
6
Enhanced and idiosyncratic neural representations of personally typical scenes.个人典型场景的增强型和特质性神经表征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Mar;292(2043):20250272. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0272. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
7
Individual gaze predicts individual scene descriptions.个体注视可预测个体对场景的描述。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94056-4.
8
Human-like face pareidolia emerges in deep neural networks optimized for face and object recognition.类人脸空想性错觉出现在针对面部和物体识别进行优化的深度神经网络中。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jan 27;21(1):e1012751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012751. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Family lexicon: Using language models to encode memories of personally familiar and famous people and places in the brain.家庭词典:利用语言模型在大脑中编码个人熟悉的人和地方的记忆。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 22;19(11):e0291099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291099. eCollection 2024.
10
Study protocol TransTAM: Transdiagnostic research into emotional disorders and cognitive-behavioral therapy of the adaptive mind.研究方案 TransTAM:适应心理的情绪障碍与认知行为疗法的跨诊断研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 5;24(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06108-0.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019 Dec;41(12):2975-2989. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2866563. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Meaning guides attention in real-world scene images: Evidence from eye movements and meaning maps.意义在真实场景图像中引导注意力:来自眼动和意义地图的证据。
J Vis. 2018 Jun 1;18(6):10. doi: 10.1167/18.6.10.
5
Scan patterns during scene viewing predict individual differences in clinical traits in a normative sample.在正常人群样本中,场景观看时的扫描模式可预测临床特征的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0196654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196654. eCollection 2018.
6
Distinct and overlapping fusiform activation to faces and food.对人脸和食物的梭形激活具有独特性和重叠性。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 1;174:393-406. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.064. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
Genetic Influence on Eye Movements to Complex Scenes at Short Timescales.遗传对短时间内复杂场景眼球运动的影响。
Curr Biol. 2017 Nov 20;27(22):3554-3560.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
8
Seeing faces is necessary for face-domain formation.看到面孔对于面部区域的形成是必要的。
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Oct;20(10):1404-1412. doi: 10.1038/nn.4635. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
9
Orienting towards social features in naturalistic scenes is reflexive.在自然场景中朝向社会特征是一种反射行为。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 25;12(7):e0182037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182037. eCollection 2017.
10
Infant viewing of social scenes is under genetic control and is atypical in autism.婴儿对社交场景的观看受基因控制,在自闭症中表现异常。
Nature. 2017 Jul 20;547(7663):340-344. doi: 10.1038/nature22999. Epub 2017 Jul 12.