Cherpitel Cheryl J, Bazargan Shahrzad
Public Health Institute, Alcohol Research Group, 2000 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Sep 10;71(3):275-80. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00140-6.
to compare brief screening instruments for alcohol use disorders, the RAPS4, RAPS4-QF, and AUDIT, against DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence and alcohol abuse among African Americans and Hispanics in a sample of inner city emergency department (ED) patients.
a probability sample of 395 African American and Hispanic patients seeking care at King Drew Medical Center Emergency Department were interviewed regarding items related to the screening and diagnostic instruments, quantity and frequency of drinking and demographic characteristics.
no difference was found between the RAPS4 and AUDIT for alcohol dependence. Sensitivity of the RAPS4-QF (the RAPS4 plus a quantity item and a frequency item) was significantly better than the AUDIT for African Americans and Hispanics, and for males, but not for females, although the RAPS4-QF identified all of those women positive for alcohol abuse criteria, compared to 93% identified by the AUDIT.
the data suggest the RAPS4 and the RAPS4-QF perform well for identifying alcohol dependence and alcohol abuse, respectively, among minority ED patients. Additional research is needed to evaluate the RAPS4-QF as a stand-alone instrument and to evaluate both instruments across gender and ethnic subgroups in other populations and in other cultural settings.
在一个市中心急诊科(ED)患者样本中,比较用于酒精使用障碍的简短筛查工具RAPS4、RAPS4-QF和AUDIT与美国精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版(DSM-IV)中关于非裔美国人和西班牙裔人群酒精依赖及酒精滥用的标准。
对在德鲁国王医疗中心急诊科寻求治疗的395名非裔美国人和西班牙裔患者进行概率抽样访谈,内容涉及与筛查和诊断工具相关的项目、饮酒量和频率以及人口统计学特征。
在酒精依赖方面,RAPS4和AUDIT之间未发现差异。对于非裔美国人和西班牙裔人群以及男性,RAPS4-QF(RAPS4加上一个饮酒量项目和一个饮酒频率项目)的敏感性显著优于AUDIT,但对于女性则不然;不过,RAPS4-QF识别出所有符合酒精滥用标准的女性,而AUDIT识别出93%符合标准的女性。
数据表明,RAPS4和RAPS4-QF分别对于识别少数族裔急诊科患者中的酒精依赖和酒精滥用表现良好。需要进一步研究以评估RAPS4-QF作为独立工具的性能,并在其他人群和其他文化背景下跨性别和种族亚组评估这两种工具。