Vassalli Giuseppe, Büeler Hansruedi, Dudler Jean, von Segesser Ludwig K, Kappenberger Lukas
Division of Cardiology, University of Lausanne Medical School, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Cardiol. 2003 Aug;90(2-3):229-38. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00554-5.
Plasmid DNA and adenovirus vectors currently used in cardiovascular gene therapy trials are limited by low efficiency and short-lived transgene expression, respectively. Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) has recently emerged as an attractive vector for cardiovascular gene therapy. In the present study, we have compared AAV and adenovirus vectors with respect to gene transfer efficiency and the duration of transgene expression in mouse hearts and arteries in vivo. AAV vectors (titer: 5 x 10(8) transducing units (TU)/ml) and adenovirus vectors (1.2 x 10(10) TU/ml) expressing a green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene were injected either intramyocardially (n=32) or intrapericardially (n=3) in CD-1 mice. Hearts were harvested at varying time intervals (3 days to 1 year) after gene delivery. After intramyocardial injection of 5 microl virus stock solution, cardiomyocyte transduction rates with AAV vectors were 4-fold lower than with adenovirus vectors (1.5% (range: 0.5-2.6%) vs. 6.2% (range: 2.7-13.7%); P<0.05), but similar to titer-matched adenovirus vectors (0.7%; range: 0.2-1.2%). AAV-mediated EGFP expression lasted for at least 1 year. AAV vectors instilled into the pericardial space transduced epicardial myocytes. Arterial gene transfer was studied in mouse carotids (n=26). Both vectors selectively transduced endothelial cells after luminal instillation. Transduction rates with AAV vectors were 8-fold lower than with adenovirus vectors (2.0% (range: 0-3.2%) vs. 16.2% (range: 8.5-20.2%); P<0.05). Prolonged EGFP expression was observed after AAV but not adenovirus-mediated gene transfer. In conclusion, AAV vectors deliver and express genes for extended periods of time in the myocardium and arterial endothelium in vivo. AAV vectors may be useful for gene therapy approaches to chronic cardiovascular diseases.
目前用于心血管基因治疗试验的质粒DNA和腺病毒载体分别受到效率低下和转基因表达短暂的限制。重组腺相关病毒(AAV)最近已成为心血管基因治疗中一种有吸引力的载体。在本研究中,我们比较了AAV和腺病毒载体在体内小鼠心脏和动脉中的基因转移效率以及转基因表达的持续时间。将表达绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)基因的AAV载体(滴度:5×10⁸转导单位(TU)/ml)和腺病毒载体(1.2×10¹⁰ TU/ml)经心肌内注射(n = 32)或心包内注射(n = 3)到CD-1小鼠体内。在基因递送后的不同时间间隔(3天至1年)采集心脏。心肌内注射5微升病毒原液后,AAV载体的心肌细胞转导率比腺病毒载体低4倍(1.5%(范围:0.5 - 2.6%)对6.2%(范围:2.7 - 13.7%);P<0.05),但与滴度匹配的腺病毒载体相似(0.7%;范围:0.2 - 1.2%)。AAV介导的EGFP表达持续至少1年。注入心包腔的AAV载体转导心外膜心肌细胞。在小鼠颈动脉(n = 26)中研究动脉基因转移。两种载体在腔内注入后均选择性转导内皮细胞。AAV载体的转导率比腺病毒载体低8倍(2.0%(范围:0 - 3.2%)对16.2%(范围:8.5 - 20.2%);P<0.05)。在AAV介导的基因转移后观察到EGFP的长期表达,而腺病毒介导的基因转移后未观察到。总之,AAV载体在体内心肌和动脉内皮中长期递送和表达基因。AAV载体可能对慢性心血管疾病的基因治疗方法有用。