• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童慢性迷走神经刺激治疗癫痫的并发症

Complications of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy in children.

作者信息

Smyth Matthew D, Tubbs R Shane, Bebin E Martina, Grabb Paul A, Blount Jeffrey P

机构信息

Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Alabama, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2003 Sep;99(3):500-3. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.3.0500.

DOI:10.3171/jns.2003.99.3.0500
PMID:12959437
Abstract

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to define better the incidence of surgical complications and untoward side effects of chronic vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in a population of children with medically refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the cases of 74 consecutive patients (41 male and 33 female) 18 years of age or younger (mean age 8.8 years, range 11 months-18 years) who had undergone implantation of a vagal stimulator between 1998 and 2001 with a minimum follow up of 1 year (mean 2.2 years). Of the 74 patients treated, seven (9.4%) had a complication ultimately resulting in removal of the stimulator. The rate of deep infections necessitating device removal was 3.5% (three of 74 patients who had undergone 85 implantation and/or revision procedures). An additional three superficial infections occurred in patients in whom the stimulators were not removed: one was treated with superficial operative debridement and antibiotic agents and the other two with oral antibiotics only. Another four stimulators (5.4%) were removed because of the absence of clinical benefit and device intolerance. Two devices were revised because of lead fracture (2.7%). Among the cohort, 11 battery changes have been performed thus far, although none less than 33 months after initial implantation. Several patients experienced stimulation-induced symptoms (hoarseness, cough, drooling, outbursts of laughter, shoulder abduction, dysphagia, or urinary retention) that did not require device removal. Ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis was identified in one patient. One patient died of aspiration pneumonia more than 30 days after device implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Vagus nerve stimulation remains a viable option for improving seizure control in difficult to treat pediatric patients with epilepsy. Surgical complications such as hardware failure (2.7%) or deep infection (3.5%) occurred, resulting in device removal or revision. Occasional stimulation-induced symptoms such as hoarseness, dysphagia, or torticollis may be expected (5.4%).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在更明确地界定慢性迷走神经刺激(VNS)在药物难治性癫痫儿童群体中的手术并发症发生率及不良副作用。

方法

作者回顾性分析了1998年至2001年间连续接受迷走神经刺激器植入的74例18岁及以下患者(41例男性,33例女性)的病例,最小随访时间为1年(平均2.2年)。在接受治疗的74例患者中,7例(9.4%)出现并发症,最终导致刺激器移除。因深部感染需要移除装置的发生率为3.5%(74例接受85次植入和/或翻修手术的患者中有3例)。另外3例患者出现浅表感染,但刺激器未被移除:1例接受了浅表手术清创和抗生素治疗,另外2例仅接受口服抗生素治疗。另有4例刺激器(5.4%)因无临床益处和装置不耐受而被移除。2例装置因导线断裂而进行了翻修(2.7%)。在该队列中,迄今为止已进行了11次电池更换,不过均在首次植入后不少于33个月时进行。数名患者出现刺激诱发的症状(声音嘶哑、咳嗽、流涎、大笑发作、肩部外展、吞咽困难或尿潴留),但无需移除装置。1例患者被诊断为同侧声带麻痹。1例患者在装置植入30多天后死于吸入性肺炎。

结论

迷走神经刺激仍然是改善难治性癫痫儿童患者癫痫控制的一种可行选择。出现了诸如硬件故障(2.7%)或深部感染(3.5%)等手术并发症,导致装置移除或翻修。可能会出现偶尔的刺激诱发症状,如声音嘶哑、吞咽困难或斜颈(5.4%)。

相似文献

1
Complications of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy in children.儿童慢性迷走神经刺激治疗癫痫的并发症
J Neurosurg. 2003 Sep;99(3):500-3. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.3.0500.
2
Vagus nerve stimulation for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: a consecutive series of 141 cases.迷走神经刺激术治疗难治性癫痫患儿:141例连续病例系列研究
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 May;7(5):491-500. doi: 10.3171/2011.2.PEDS10505.
3
Operative and technical complications of vagus nerve stimulator implantation.迷走神经刺激器植入术的手术和技术并发症。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Dec;67(2 Suppl Operative):489-94. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f88867.
4
Vagus nerve stimulation: Surgical technique of implantation and revision and related morbidity.迷走神经刺激术:植入和修正手术技术及相关发病率。
Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58 Suppl 1:85-90. doi: 10.1111/epi.13678.
5
The vagal nerve stimulation outcome, and laryngeal effect: Otolaryngologists roles and perspective.迷走神经刺激的结果及喉部效应:耳鼻喉科医生的作用与观点。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Jul-Aug;38(4):408-413. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
6
Vagus nerve stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy: a long-term follow-up study.迷走神经刺激治疗药物难治性癫痫:一项长期随访研究。
Seizure. 2007 Oct;16(7):579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 May 31.
7
Vagus nerve stimulation after lead revision.刺激迷走神经后修订导联。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Mar;32(3):E11. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.FOCUS11333.
8
Refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: vagus nerve stimulation with or without subsequent resective surgery.结节性硬化症的耐药性癫痫:迷走神经刺激术联合或不联合后续切除术。
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Nov;16(3):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
9
Revision of vagal nerve stimulator electrodes: technical approach.迷走神经刺激器电极的修订:技术方法
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Jun;146(6):567-70; discussion 570. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0246-z. Epub 2004 Apr 18.
10
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: a Belgian multicenter study.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫:一项比利时多中心研究。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2007 Sep;11(5):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation: Worldwide collection and perspectives.右侧迷走神经刺激:全球范围内的收集与观点
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2025 Mar;12(3):565-576. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52312. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
2
Long-term outcome of operated Chiari I patients between 2005 and 2020 in Eastern Finland.2005 年至 2020 年在东芬兰接受手术治疗的 Chiari I 型患者的长期结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Feb 28;166(1):115. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-05999-y.
3
Neuromodulation techniques - From non-invasive brain stimulation to deep brain stimulation.
神经调节技术 - 从非侵入性脑刺激到深部脑刺激。
Neurotherapeutics. 2024 Apr;21(3):e00330. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00330. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
4
Externalization of an infected vagus nerve stimulator generator without a break in anti-seizure therapy: a technical note.体外感染迷走神经刺激器发生器,无需中断抗癫痫治疗:技术说明。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Dec;39(12):3589-3591. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06036-6. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Vagus nerve stimulator revision in pediatric epilepsy patients: a technical note and case series.小儿癫痫患者的迷走神经刺激器翻修:技术说明与病例系列
Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Feb;39(2):435-441. doi: 10.1007/s00381-022-05769-0. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
6
Complete section of the left vagus nerve does not preclude the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation: illustrative case.左侧迷走神经完全离断并不排除迷走神经刺激的疗效:病例说明
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2021 Jul 19;2(3):CASE21128. doi: 10.3171/CASE21128.
7
Guidance on Dravet syndrome from infant to adult care: Road map for treatment planning in Europe.婴儿至成人照护的德拉维特综合征指南:欧洲治疗规划路线图。
Epilepsia Open. 2022 Mar;7(1):11-26. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12569. Epub 2021 Dec 19.
8
Intra-operative monitoring as an adjuvant to standard vagus nerve stimulation implantation.术中监测作为标准迷走神经刺激植入术的辅助手段。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2021 Dec;37(12):3809-3816. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05295-5. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
9
The Effect of Cranial Nerve Stimulation on Swallowing: A Systematic Review.经颅神经刺激对吞咽的影响:系统评价。
Dysphagia. 2021 Apr;36(2):216-230. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10126-x. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Mode-Dependent Effect of Xenon Inhalation on Kainic Acid-Induced Status Epilepticus in Rats.氙气吸入对大鼠海人酸诱导的癫痫持续状态的模式依赖性影响。
Front Cell Neurosci. 2019 Aug 14;13:375. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00375. eCollection 2019.