• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化与变化盲视。

Culture and change blindness.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of AlbertaDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar 4;30(2):381-99. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_63.

DOI:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_63
PMID:21702819
Abstract

Research on perception and cognition suggests that whereas East Asians view the world holistically, attending to the entire field and relations among objects, Westerners view the world analytically, focusing on the attributes of salient objects. These propositions were examined in the change-blindness paradigm. Research in that paradigm finds American participants to be more sensitive to changes in focal objects than to changes in the periphery or context. We anticipated that this would be less true for East Asians and that they would be more sensitive to context changes than would Americans. We presented participants with still photos and with animated vignettes having changes in focal object information and contextual information. Compared to Americans, East Asians were more sensitive to contextual changes than to focal object changes. These results suggest that there can be cultural variation in what may seem to be basic perceptual processes.

摘要

研究表明,在感知和认知方面,东亚人整体地看待世界,关注整个领域和物体之间的关系,而西方人则分析地看待世界,关注突出物体的属性。这些观点在变化盲视范式中得到了检验。该范式的研究发现,美国参与者对焦点物体的变化比周边或背景的变化更敏感。我们预计,东亚人对此的敏感度会降低,他们对背景变化的敏感度会高于美国人。我们向参与者展示了静态照片和动画小插图,其中焦点物体信息和背景信息发生了变化。与美国人相比,东亚人对背景变化的敏感度高于对焦点物体变化的敏感度。这些结果表明,在看似基本的感知过程中,可能存在文化差异。

相似文献

1
Culture and change blindness.文化与变化盲视。
Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar 4;30(2):381-99. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_63.
2
The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception.文化的影响:整体观与分析性认知
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Oct;9(10):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004.
3
Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans.整体式参与与分析式参与:比较日本人和美国人对情境的敏感度
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):922-34. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.922.
4
Culture and point of view.文化与观点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):11163-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934527100. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
5
Culture and aesthetic preference: comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans.文化与审美偏好:比较东亚人和美国人对背景的关注
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Sep;34(9):1260-75. doi: 10.1177/0146167208320555.
6
Cultural differences in the lateral occipital complex while viewing incongruent scenes.观看不一致场景时的外侧枕叶复合体的文化差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):236-41. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp056. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
7
Separating processes in object perception.物体感知中的分离过程。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Jan;78(1):84-97; discussion 98-106. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2604.
8
Cultural Differences in Allocation of Attention in Visual Information Processing.视觉信息处理中注意力分配的文化差异
J Cross Cult Psychol. 2009;40(3):349-360. doi: 10.1177/0022022108331005.
9
Cultural influences on Facebook photographs.文化对 Facebook 照片的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(3):334-43. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.649285. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
10
Perceiving an object in its context: is the context cultural or perceptual?在情境中感知物体:情境是文化性的还是感知性的?
J Vis. 2008 Sep 11;8(12):2.1-5. doi: 10.1167/8.12.2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-cultural analysis of eye-movement patterns in visual scene perception: a comparison of seven cultural samples.视觉场景感知中眼动模式的跨文化分析:七个文化样本的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28574. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12724-x.
2
Visual short-term memory, culture, and image structure.视觉短期记忆、文化与图像结构。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03094-7.
3
Cultural Differences in Visual Attention Emerge in Infancy.视觉注意力方面的文化差异在婴儿期就已出现。
Infancy. 2025 Jan-Feb;30(1):e12651. doi: 10.1111/infa.12651.
4
How Age and Culture Influence Cognition: A Lifespan Developmental Perspective.年龄与文化如何影响认知:一种毕生发展视角
Dev Rev. 2025 Mar;75. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2024.101169. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
5
Psychophysiological distinctions in emotional responding: sensitivity to perceiving loss of connection.情绪反应中的心理生理差异:对感知到的联系丧失的敏感性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 9;18:1363546. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1363546. eCollection 2024.
6
Does culture moderate the encoding and recognition of negative cues? Evidence from an eye-tracking study.文化是否调节了消极线索的编码和识别?来自眼动研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0295301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295301. eCollection 2024.
7
Culture, prefrontal volume, and memory.文化、前额叶体积与记忆。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0298235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298235. eCollection 2024.
8
Exploring cross-cultural variations in visual attention patterns inside and outside national borders using immersive virtual reality.使用沉浸式虚拟现实技术探索国界内外视觉注意力模式的跨文化差异。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 1;13(1):18852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46103-1.
9
The framing of subjectivity: Point-of-view in a cross-cultural analysis of comics.主观性的构建:漫画跨文化分析中的视角
J Graph Nov Comics. 2022 Dec 1;14(3):336-350. doi: 10.1080/21504857.2022.2152067. eCollection 2023.
10
Analytic and holistic cognitive style as a set of independent manifests: Evidence from a validation study of six measurement instruments.分析型和整体型认知风格作为一组独立的表现:来自六个测量工具的验证研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 13;18(6):e0287057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287057. eCollection 2023.