Suppr超能文献

对于中度至中度重度寻常痤疮患者,联合口服和外用治疗是否优于单纯口服治疗?一项关于利美环素加0.1%阿达帕林凝胶与利美环素加赋形剂凝胶的疗效和安全性比较。

Is combined oral and topical therapy better than oral therapy alone in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris? A comparison of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline plus adapalene gel 0.1%, versus lymecycline plus gel vehicle.

作者信息

Cunliffe William J, Meynadier Jean, Alirezai Mohsen, George Sheru A, Coutts Ian, Roseeuw Diane I, Hachem Jean Pierre, Briantais Philippe, Sidou Farzaneh, Soto Pascale

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, UK.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Sep;49(3 Suppl):S218-26. doi: 10.1067/s0190-9622(03)01153-8.

Abstract

This multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of lymecycline 300 mg/day orally and adapalene topical gel 0.1% (n = 118) to lymecycline 300 mg/day orally plus vehicle gel (n = 124) in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris with both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. The primary efficacy end point, total lesion count at end point (last observation carried forward), showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the lymecycline plus adapalene group (P =.0011). The mean decrease in total, inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts was significantly greater at end point in the lymecycline plus adapalene group than in the lymecycline plus vehicle group (P <.01). In addition, a significant difference for inflammatory and total acne lesions was seen sooner in the adapalene plus lymecycline group. In total, 75.5% of patients in the lymecycline plus adapalene group were markedly improved, almost clear or clear of their lesions at week 12, compared with 51.8% of those in the lymecycline plus vehicle group (P <.001). Local cutaneous tolerance was generally good in both groups, although more patients receiving the lymecycline plus adapalene combination experienced cutaneous reactions than those receiving lymecycline plus vehicle. There are relatively few studies comparing the efficacy of combined oral and topical therapy with either individual therapy alone. This study clearly demonstrates that lymecycline plus adapalene combination treatment resulted in a significantly greater mean decrease in the number of inflammatory, noninflammatory and total lesions than lymecycline plus vehicle and was well tolerated.

摘要

这项多中心、随机、研究者设盲的研究,比较了口服300毫克/日的赖甲环素与0.1%的阿达帕林外用凝胶联合使用(n = 118)和口服300毫克/日的赖甲环素加赋形剂凝胶(n = 124)对患有中度至中度重度寻常痤疮且有炎性和非炎性损害患者的疗效和耐受性。主要疗效终点为终点时的总皮损计数(末次观察结转),结果显示赖甲环素加阿达帕林组具有统计学显著差异(P = 0.0011)。在终点时,赖甲环素加阿达帕林组的总皮损、炎性皮损和非炎性皮损计数的平均减少量显著大于赖甲环素加赋形剂组(P < 0.01)。此外,阿达帕林加赖甲环素组在炎性和总痤疮皮损方面的显著差异出现得更早。总体而言,赖甲环素加阿达帕林组75.5%的患者在第12周时皮损明显改善、几乎消退或消退,而赖甲环素加赋形剂组为51.8%(P < 0.001)。两组的局部皮肤耐受性总体良好,尽管接受赖甲环素加阿达帕林联合治疗的患者出现皮肤反应的比接受赖甲环素加赋形剂治疗的患者更多。比较联合口服和外用疗法与单独使用单一疗法疗效的研究相对较少。这项研究清楚地表明,赖甲环素加阿达帕林联合治疗导致炎性、非炎性和总皮损数量的平均减少量显著大于赖甲环素加赋形剂,且耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验