Sylaidis P, Clibbon J, Eagling V, King C
Australian Craniofacial Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia.
J Wound Care. 2001 Jul;10(7):273-5. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.7.26094.
This study compared the speed of dry removal of perforated adhesive tape from skin with some of the more commonly used solvents, namely acetone, arachis (peanut) oil, paraffin oil and saline. Twenty healthy volunteers had each of the solvents used on separate adhesive tapes applied circumferentially to their arms. Time to removal was recorded and analysed using the non-parametric sign test. The findings indicate that removing the tape dry was faster than using solvents, with the exception of acetone. Additionally, the researchers had difficulty cleaning the skin following the removal of tape when solvents were used. The solvents tended to cause some disintegration of the tape adhesive, which remained attached to the volunteers' skin and was difficult to remove. The researchers' preference is for dry removal of perforated adhesive tapes.
本研究比较了从皮肤上干式去除穿孔胶带的速度与一些更常用溶剂（即丙酮、花生油、石蜡油和生理盐水）的去除速度。20名健康志愿者在分别环绕贴于其手臂的胶带上使用了每种溶剂。记录去除时间，并使用非参数符号检验进行分析。研究结果表明，除丙酮外，干式去除胶带比使用溶剂更快。此外，使用溶剂去除胶带后，研究人员难以清洁皮肤。这些溶剂往往会导致胶带粘合剂部分分解，粘合剂仍附着在志愿者皮肤上且难以去除。研究人员更倾向于干式去除穿孔胶带。
