• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Skin prick testing with standardized extracts from 3 different manufacturers. A comparative randomized study.

作者信息

Nielsen N H, Dirksen A, Mosbech H, Launbjerg J, Biering I, Søborg M

机构信息

Allergy Clinic, Frederiksborg County Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1992 Nov-Dec;20(6):246-8.

PMID:1296467
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare skin reactivity to routine allergen prick test with panels of allergens, supplied by three different manufacturers. The allergens comprised ten aero-allergens commonly used for skin prick test in Northern Europe, and included pollen, dander, house dust mites, and moulds. Two hundred consecutive patients were tested. The methods for standardization of allergen extracts, declaration of allergenic potency, and recommended lancets differed. The equipment were Soluprick SQ (Allergologisk Laboratorium A/S, Denmark) (ALK), Alphatest (Dome/Hollister-Stier, U.K.) (DHS), and Phazet (Pharmacia, Sweden) (PHA). The coefficient of variation for the allergen coated PHA (same lancet was applied twice) was 0.31, and for ALK and DHS allergen extracts 0.13 and 0.18, respectively. The frequencies of patients with positive reactions to the various allergens were generally similar, although DHS appeared to elicit less positive reactions to Timothy, dog, and Dermatophagoides pteronnyssinus. For the individual physician, it may be important to know the allergenic activity of the different allergens in his routine panel compared to the activity in other similar panels.

摘要

相似文献

1
Skin prick testing with standardized extracts from 3 different manufacturers. A comparative randomized study.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1992 Nov-Dec;20(6):246-8.
2
Phazet skin prick tests versus conventional prick tests with allergens and histamine in children.儿童中使用Phazet皮肤点刺试验与传统过敏原和组胺点刺试验的比较。
Ann Allergy. 1990 Feb;64(2 Pt 1):166-9.
3
Variation in potency of extracts used for allergy skin tests.用于过敏皮肤试验的提取物效价的变化。
N Z Med J. 1981 Jul 8;93(687):2-4.
4
Skin-prick test reactions to inhalant allergens in asthmatic patients.哮喘患者对吸入性变应原的皮肤点刺试验反应
Med J Aust. 1976 Jun 12;1(24):918-24.
5
[Specific skin reactions induced by individual pollen preparations in hypersensitivity persons].[过敏体质者中个体花粉制剂诱发的特异性皮肤反应]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 Sep-Oct;126(9-10):362-7.
6
Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing.用于皮肤点刺试验的不同诊断产品的比较。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Feb;41(1):23-31.
7
[Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].[草花粉过敏患者组胺等效皮肤试验中的皮肤反应性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2000 May-Jun;128(5-6):194-9.
8
The prevalence of positive reactions in the atopy patch test with aeroallergens and food allergens in subjects with atopic eczema: a European multicenter study.特应性皮炎患者使用气传变应原和食物变应原进行特应性斑贴试验时阳性反应的患病率:一项欧洲多中心研究。
Allergy. 2004 Dec;59(12):1318-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00556.x.
9
GA2LEN skin test study III: minimum battery of test inhalent allergens needed in epidemiological studies in patients.GA2LEN 皮肤测试研究 III:患者进行流行病学研究时所需的最小吸入性变应原测试套件。
Allergy. 2009 Nov;64(11):1656-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02169.x.
10
[Comparative study of 3 types of lancets for performing prick tests].[用于进行点刺试验的3种采血针的比较研究]
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):58-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of The Safety and Efficacy of Newly Developed Domestic Allergenic Extracts for Skin Prick Testing.国产新研发变应原提取物用于皮肤点刺试验的安全性和有效性评估
Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2021 Jul;10(2):257-265. doi: 10.52547/rbmb.10.2.257.
2
Evaluation of major mite allergens from European standardized commercial extracts for in vivo diagnosis: addressing the need for precision medicine.用于体内诊断的欧洲标准化商业提取物中主要螨过敏原的评估:满足精准医学的需求。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2019 Feb 25;9:14. doi: 10.1186/s13601-019-0254-y. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods.
采用体内和体外方法比较新开发的和市售吸入性过敏原皮肤点刺试验试剂。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Mar 26;33(13):e101. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e101.
4
Are allergen batch differences and the use of double skin prick test important?变应原批次差异及双重皮肤点刺试验的应用是否重要?
BMC Pulm Med. 2015 Apr 9;15:33. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0021-3.
5
The skin prick test - European standards.皮肤点刺试验 - 欧洲标准。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2013 Feb 1;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-3-3.
6
Varying allergen composition and content affects the in vivo allergenic activity of commercial Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extracts.变应原组成和含量的差异会影响市售屋尘螨提取液的体内变应原活性。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;159(3):253-62. doi: 10.1159/000337654. Epub 2012 Jun 21.