Suppr超能文献

采用体内和体外方法比较新开发的和市售吸入性过敏原皮肤点刺试验试剂。

Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods.

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Institute of Allergy, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Mar 26;33(13):e101. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We developed skin prick test (SPT) reagents for common inhalant allergens that reflected the real exposure in Korea. The study aim was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness and allergen potency of our inhalant SPT reagents in comparison with commercial products.

METHODS

We produced eight common inhalant allergen SPT reagents using total extract (Prolagen): Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, oak, ragweed, mugwort, Humulus japonicus pollens, as well as cat and dog allergens. We compared the newly developed reagents with three commercially available SPT reagents (Allergopharma, Hollister-Stier, Lofarma). We measured total protein concentrations, sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), major allergen concentration, and biological allergen potencies measured by immunoglobulin E (IgE) immunoblotting and ImmunoCAP inhibition test.

RESULTS

Diagnostic values of these SPT reagents were expressed as positivity rate and concordance rate of the results from ImmunoCAP allergen-specific IgE test in 94 allergic patients. In vitro analysis showed marked differences in protein concentrations, SDS-PAGE features, major allergen concentrations, and biological allergen potencies of four different SPT reagents. In vivo analysis showed that positive rates and concordance rates of Prolagen® SPT reagents were similar compared to the three commercial SPT reagents.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed Prolagen® inhalant SPT reagents are not inferior to the commercially available SPT reagents in allergy diagnosis.

摘要

背景

我们开发了反映韩国实际暴露情况的常见吸入性过敏原皮肤点刺试验(SPT)试剂。本研究旨在评估我们的吸入性 SPT 试剂与商业产品相比的诊断有用性和过敏原效价。

方法

我们使用总提取物(Prolagen)生产了八种常见吸入性过敏原 SPT 试剂:粉尘螨、屋尘螨、栎树、豚草、艾蒿、葎草花粉,以及猫和狗过敏原。我们将新开发的试剂与三种市售 SPT 试剂(Allergopharma、Hollister-Stier、Lofarma)进行了比较。我们测量了总蛋白浓度、十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)、主要过敏原浓度以及通过免疫球蛋白 E(IgE)免疫印迹和 ImmunoCAP 抑制试验测量的生物过敏原效价。

结果

这些 SPT 试剂的诊断价值以 94 名过敏患者的 ImmunoCAP 过敏原特异性 IgE 试验结果的阳性率和一致性率来表示。体外分析显示四种不同 SPT 试剂的蛋白浓度、SDS-PAGE 特征、主要过敏原浓度和生物过敏原效价存在明显差异。体内分析表明,Prolagen® SPT 试剂的阳性率和一致性率与三种商业 SPT 试剂相似。

结论

新开发的 Prolagen®吸入性 SPT 试剂在过敏诊断方面并不逊于市售 SPT 试剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb71/5865053/3728b7c0fb3f/jkms-33-e101-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验