Ardia Daniel R, Schat Karel A, Winkler David W
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2701, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 22;270(1525):1679-83. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2424.
We examined whether strategies of reproductive allocation may reduce long-term immunocompetence through the effects of manipulated effort on secondary or acquired immunity. We tested whether increased reproductive effort leads to reduced immune function and survival by manipulating brood size in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and exposing breeding females to a primary and secondary exposure of sheep red blood cells to elicit a humoral immune response. Females raising enlarged broods produced fewer secondary antibodies than did females raising control or reduced broods. Most importantly, individuals with high secondary responses were more likely to survive to breed 3 years after brood manipulations, suggesting that differences in disease susceptibility may be caused by trade-offs in reproductive allocation. We also found that individual quality, measured by clutch initiation date, mediated the effects of brood manipulations, with higher-quality birds showing a greater ability to deal with increases in effort.
我们研究了生殖分配策略是否会通过操控努力对二次免疫或获得性免疫的影响来降低长期免疫能力。我们通过操控树燕(双色树燕)的窝卵数,并让繁殖期雌鸟接受一次和二次绵羊红细胞暴露以引发体液免疫反应,来测试增加生殖努力是否会导致免疫功能和存活率降低。饲养扩大窝卵数雏鸟的雌鸟产生的二次抗体比饲养对照窝卵数或减少窝卵数雏鸟的雌鸟少。最重要的是,二次反应高的个体在窝卵数操控后更有可能存活到三年后繁殖,这表明疾病易感性的差异可能是由生殖分配的权衡导致的。我们还发现,以产蛋起始日期衡量的个体质量介导了窝卵数操控的影响,质量较高的鸟类应对努力增加的能力更强。