Sung Joseph J Y, Chan Francis K L, Lau James Y W, Yung Man-Yee, Leung Wai-Keung, Wu Justin C Y, Ng Enders K W, Chung S C Sydney
Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19;139(4):237-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-4-200308190-00005.
The optimal treatment of ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels and adherent clots is unclear.
To compare intravenous omeprazole infusion plus endoscopic therapy with intravenous omeprazole infusion alone for prevention of recurrent bleeding from ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels or adherent clots.
Single-blind randomized study with blinded evaluation of study end points.
An endoscopy center in a university hospital in Hong Kong.
156 persons with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and ulcers showing nonbleeding visible vessels or adherent clots.
Combination of endoscopic therapy and omeprazole infusion versus sham endoscopic therapy and omeprazole infusion.
Recurrent ulcer bleeding before discharge and within 30 days.
78 patients were recruited in each group. Ulcer bleeding recurred before discharge in seven patients who received intravenous omeprazole alone (9%) and no patients who received combined therapy (difference, 9 percentage points [95% CI, 1.7 to 17.6 percentage points]; P = 0.01). The probability of recurrent bleeding within 30 days was 11.6% (9 patients) in the omeprazole-alone group and 1.1% (1 patient) in the combined therapy group (difference, 10.5 percentage points [CI, 1.7 to 19.8 percentage points]; P = 0.009). Patients in the combined therapy group required less transfusion (difference in median units of blood transfused, 1 unit [CI, 0 to 2 units]; P = 0.02). One patient in the combined therapy group had surgery for ulcer perforation. Four patients receiving omeprazole alone (5.1%) and two patients receiving combined therapy (2.6%) died within 30 days.
The combination of endoscopic therapy and omeprazole infusion is superior to omeprazole infusion alone for preventing recurrent bleeding from ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels and adherent clots.
对于伴有非出血性可见血管和附着血凝块的溃疡,最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。
比较静脉输注奥美拉唑联合内镜治疗与单纯静脉输注奥美拉唑预防伴有非出血性可见血管或附着血凝块的溃疡复发出血的效果。
单盲随机研究,对研究终点进行盲法评估。
香港一所大学医院的内镜中心。
156例上消化道出血且溃疡伴有非出血性可见血管或附着血凝块的患者。
内镜治疗与奥美拉唑输注联合治疗对比假内镜治疗与奥美拉唑输注。
出院前及30天内溃疡复发出血情况。
每组招募78例患者。单纯接受静脉输注奥美拉唑的7例患者(9%)在出院前溃疡出血复发,而接受联合治疗的患者无复发(差异为9个百分点[95%CI,1.7至17.6个百分点];P = 0.01)。单纯奥美拉唑组30天内出血复发概率为11.6%(9例患者),联合治疗组为1.1%(1例患者)(差异为10.5个百分点[CI,1.7至19.8个百分点];P = 0.009)。联合治疗组患者输血需求更少(输注血液中位数单位差异为1单位[CI,0至2单位];P = 0.02)。联合治疗组有1例患者因溃疡穿孔接受手术。单纯接受奥美拉唑治疗的4例患者(5.1%)和接受联合治疗的2例患者(2.6%)在30天内死亡。
内镜治疗与奥美拉唑输注联合治疗在预防伴有非出血性可见血管和附着血凝块的溃疡复发出血方面优于单纯奥美拉唑输注。